55
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical Trial Report

Bronchodilator efficacy of extrafine glycopyrronium bromide: the Glyco 2 study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 2001-2014 | Published online: 07 Jul 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Patient baseline demographics and disease characteristics

Figure 1A Patient flow through Part 1 of the study.

Notes: aIncluding four replacement patients. bPatients were replaced, with replacements starting from the next treatment planned to be administered to the withdrawn patients, such that there were 12 evaluable patients in each treatment period.

Abbreviation: ECG, electrocardiogram.

Figure 1A Patient flow through Part 1 of the study.Notes: aIncluding four replacement patients. bPatients were replaced, with replacements starting from the next treatment planned to be administered to the withdrawn patients, such that there were 12 evaluable patients in each treatment period.Abbreviation: ECG, electrocardiogram.

Figure 1B Patient flow through Part 2 of the study.

Note: aReasons included spirometry results, poor venous access and recruitment having been stopped.
Figure 1B Patient flow through Part 2 of the study.

Figure 2 Study Part 1: Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0–12h after a single dose.

Note: Data are mean and 95% CI.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.

Figure 2 Study Part 1: Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0–12h after a single dose.Note: Data are mean and 95% CI.Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.

Figure 3 Study Part 1: Change from baseline in peak FEV1 after a single dose.

Note: Data are mean and 95% CI.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.
Figure 3 Study Part 1: Change from baseline in peak FEV1 after a single dose.

Figure 4 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean 12 h trough FEV1 on Day 7.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus placebo. Data plotted are adjusted mean and 95% CI.
Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.
Figure 4 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean 12 h trough FEV1 on Day 7.

Figure 5 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean FEV1 AUC0–12h on Day 7.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus placebo. Data plotted are adjusted mean and 95% CI.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; n, number of randomized patients.
Figure 5 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean FEV1 AUC0–12h on Day 7.

Figure 6 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 8.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus placebo; P<0.05 versus GB 12.5 μg BID; §P<0.05 versus tiotropium. Data plotted are adjusted mean and 95% CI.
Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; n, number of randomized patients; OD, once daily.
Figure 6 Study Part 2: Adjusted mean pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 8.

Figure 7 Study Part 2: Difference in peak FEV1 between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus Day 7. Data plotted are mean and 95% CI. Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.

Figure 7 Study Part 2: Difference in peak FEV1 between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.Notes: *P<0.001 versus Day 7. Data plotted are mean and 95% CI. Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.

Figure 8 Study Part 2: Difference in FEV1 AUC0–12h between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus Day 7. Data plotted are mean and 95% CI.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; n, number of randomized patients.
Figure 8 Study Part 2: Difference in FEV1 AUC0–12h between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.

Table 2 Study Part 1: Overall experience of AEs and SAEs

Table 3 Study Part 2: Overall experience of AEs and SAEs

Table 4 Study Part 2: PK parameters of GB on Day 1 and Day 7

Figure S1 Study Part 2: Difference in 12 h trough FEV1 between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.

Notes: *P<0.001 versus Day 7. Data plotted are mean and 95% CI.

Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; n, number of randomized patients.

Figure S1 Study Part 2: Difference in 12 h trough FEV1 between Day 7 and Day 8, following administration of formoterol.Notes: *P<0.001 versus Day 7. Data plotted are mean and 95% CI.Abbreviations: BID, twice daily; CI, confidence interval; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; GB, glycopyrronium bromide; n, number of randomized patients.