119
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of pulsed versus continuous oxygen delivery using realistic adult nasal airway replicas

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2559-2571 | Published online: 24 Aug 2017

Figures & data

Table 1 Airway replica volumes and surface areas for 15 adult nasal airway replicas

Figure 1 Solid 3D nose–throat airways of the 15 replicas tested in the present study.

Note: The top row displays airways derived from MRI, while the bottom two rows display airways derived from CT images.
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 1 Solid 3D nose–throat airways of the 15 replicas tested in the present study.

Figure 2 Schematic of experimental apparatus.

Note: Arrows indicate direction of oxygen flow.
Figure 2 Schematic of experimental apparatus.

Table 2 Breathing parameters of representative breathing profiles for COPD patients at rest, doing light exercise, and while asleep

Table 3 SimplyGo oxygen pulse characteristics at pulse flow setting numbers of 2.0 and 6.0 using various breathing frequencies

Figure 3 Example of oxygen mole fraction and flow rate waveforms indicating (A) steady flow oxygen delivery, (B) complete pulse delivery, and (C) incomplete pulse delivery.

Notes: Waveforms were selected from experiments conducted using subject CT7 with the sleep breathing pattern (A) and (C), and using subject CT9 with the rest breathing pattern (B). Positive flow rates indicate inspiration; negative flow rates indicate expiration. Numbers indicate points of interest in the oxygen waveform: (1) maximum inspiratory oxygen fraction; (2) minimum inspiratory oxygen fraction; (3) oxygen fraction changing through onset of exhalation; (4) oxygen fraction rising/falling to end-expiratory value.
Figure 3 Example of oxygen mole fraction and flow rate waveforms indicating (A) steady flow oxygen delivery, (B) complete pulse delivery, and (C) incomplete pulse delivery.

Table 4 Number of breathing replicas indicating incomplete pulse delivery out of the total number of replicas used to calculate volume-averaged fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at each setting/breathing pattern combination

Figure 4 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 2.0 L/min and PF setting number 2.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.

Notes: For exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode, n=12; with sleep mode, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.

Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.

Figure 4 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 2.0 L/min and PF setting number 2.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.Notes: For exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode, n=12; with sleep mode, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.

Figure 5 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 6.0 L/min and PF setting number 6.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.

Notes: For exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode, n=11; with sleep mode, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.
Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.
Figure 5 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 6.0 L/min and PF setting number 6.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.

Figure 6 Pressure drop measured at the cannula as a function of inspiratory flow rate, averaged over three measurements for all 5 MRI subjects.

Note: Error bars represent one standard deviation.
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
Figure 6 Pressure drop measured at the cannula as a function of inspiratory flow rate, averaged over three measurements for all 5 MRI subjects.

Figure 7 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 estimated from airway experiments and FiO2 predicted using pulse characteristics.

Notes: Airway experiment FiO2 values were averaged over n airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica. For all experiments with exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode setting number 2.0, n=12; with pulse mode setting number 6.0, n=11; with sleep mode setting numbers 2.0 and 6.0, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.
Abbreviation: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen.
Figure 7 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 estimated from airway experiments and FiO2 predicted using pulse characteristics.