Figures & data
Table 1 Airway replica volumes and surface areas for 15 adult nasal airway replicas
Figure 1 Solid 3D nose–throat airways of the 15 replicas tested in the present study.
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
![Figure 1 Solid 3D nose–throat airways of the 15 replicas tested in the present study.](/cms/asset/a58ba3e0-860d-41cf-9e88-b71fd2d59a10/dcop_a_141976_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 2 Breathing parameters of representative breathing profiles for COPD patients at rest, doing light exercise, and while asleep
Table 3 SimplyGo oxygen pulse characteristics at pulse flow setting numbers of 2.0 and 6.0 using various breathing frequencies
Figure 3 Example of oxygen mole fraction and flow rate waveforms indicating (A) steady flow oxygen delivery, (B) complete pulse delivery, and (C) incomplete pulse delivery.
![Figure 3 Example of oxygen mole fraction and flow rate waveforms indicating (A) steady flow oxygen delivery, (B) complete pulse delivery, and (C) incomplete pulse delivery.](/cms/asset/ec2ab35f-fea2-46ea-907c-9ca5eb6bdd4e/dcop_a_141976_f0003_b.jpg)
Table 4 Number of breathing replicas indicating incomplete pulse delivery out of the total number of replicas used to calculate volume-averaged fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) at each setting/breathing pattern combination
Figure 4 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 2.0 L/min and PF setting number 2.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.
Notes: For exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode, n=12; with sleep mode, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.
Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.
![Figure 4 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 2.0 L/min and PF setting number 2.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.Notes: For exercise and rest breathing patterns, n=15. For the sleep breathing pattern combined with pulse mode, n=12; with sleep mode, n=14. Error bars indicate one standard deviation.Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.](/cms/asset/7cb1bee3-9ad9-41db-a001-0e741cbe5c00/dcop_a_141976_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 6.0 L/min and PF setting number 6.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.
Abbreviations: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; SF, steady flow; PF, pulse flow.
![Figure 5 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 at SF 6.0 L/min and PF setting number 6.0, averaged over n different airway replicas, measured using five successive breaths per replica.](/cms/asset/f2492466-ffb3-4d0d-86cf-d6b7765a5804/dcop_a_141976_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6 Pressure drop measured at the cannula as a function of inspiratory flow rate, averaged over three measurements for all 5 MRI subjects.
Abbreviations: CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.
![Figure 6 Pressure drop measured at the cannula as a function of inspiratory flow rate, averaged over three measurements for all 5 MRI subjects.](/cms/asset/a1664396-6836-4d1e-b2ef-6e2a3843296d/dcop_a_141976_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 estimated from airway experiments and FiO2 predicted using pulse characteristics.
Abbreviation: FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen.
![Figure 7 Comparison of volume-averaged FiO2 estimated from airway experiments and FiO2 predicted using pulse characteristics.](/cms/asset/31653894-a8e7-4d95-af0e-4e11c9105166/dcop_a_141976_f0007_b.jpg)