270
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness Of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy In COPD: The IMPACT Trial

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all
Pages 2681-2695 | Published online: 29 Nov 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1 Linked-risk equation model. Blue lines indicate the relationship between the central attributes in the different time periods. Orange lines indicate the relationship between intermediate outcomes and exacerbations. Black lines indicate the relationship between the central attributes and the final health outcomes. Adapted from Briggs AH, Baker T, Risebrough NA, et al (2017). Development of the Galaxy Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Model Using Data from ECLIPSE: Internal Validation of a Linked-Equations Cohort Model Med Decis Making, 37(4): 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16653118. Copyright © 2017 by the authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications, Inc.Citation11 *Calculated (in mL) using the risk equation at 1 year and converted to FEV1% predicted based on the cohort profile.

Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6-min walk test; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 s; LY, life year; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; RU, resource utilization; SGRQ, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire.
Figure 1 Linked-risk equation model. Blue lines indicate the relationship between the central attributes in the different time periods. Orange lines indicate the relationship between intermediate outcomes and exacerbations. Black lines indicate the relationship between the central attributes and the final health outcomes. Adapted from Briggs AH, Baker T, Risebrough NA, et al (2017). Development of the Galaxy Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Model Using Data from ECLIPSE: Internal Validation of a Linked-Equations Cohort Model Med Decis Making, 37(4): 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X16653118. Copyright © 2017 by the authors. Reprinted by permission of SAGE Publications, Inc.Citation11 *Calculated (in mL) using the risk equation at 1 year and converted to FEV1% predicted based on the cohort profile.

Table 1 Summary Of Model Inputs

Table 2 Cumulative And Incremental Lifetime Outcomes Of FF/UMEC/VI Versus FF/VI

Figure 2 Incremental cost-effectiveness plane for FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI (A), and tornado plot of sensitivity and scenario analyses (B). *Assume 100% market share of product.

Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6-min walk test; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; C$, Canadian dollars; DPI, dry-powder inhaler; FF, fluticasone furoate; FP, fluticasone propionate; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; ITT, intent to treat; LABA, long-acting β2-agonist; mMRC, modified Medical Research Council; PSA, probabilistic sensitivity analysis; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SAL, salmeterol; SITT, single-inhaler triple therapy; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 2 Incremental cost-effectiveness plane for FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI (A), and tornado plot of sensitivity and scenario analyses (B). *Assume 100% market share of product.

Figure 3 Net benefit acceptability curves for FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI.

Abbreviations: C$, Canadian dollars; FF, fluticasone furoate; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 3 Net benefit acceptability curves for FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI.

Table 3 Cumulative And Incremental Lifetime Outcomes Of FF/UMEC/VI Versus FF/VI

Figure 4 Incremental cost-effectiveness plane for FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI (A), and tornado plot of sensitivity and scenario analyses (B). *Assume 100% market share of product.

Abbreviations: 6MWT, 6-min walk test; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; C$, Canadian dollars; DPI, dry-powder inhaler; FF, fluticasone furoate; FP, fluticasone propionate; ICER, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; ITT, intent to treat; LABA, long-acting β2-agonist; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonist; mMRC, modified Medical Research Council; PSA, probabilistic sensitivity analysis; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SAL, salmeterol; SITT, single-inhaler triple therapy; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 4 Incremental cost-effectiveness plane for FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI (A), and tornado plot of sensitivity and scenario analyses (B). *Assume 100% market share of product.

Figure 5 Net benefit acceptability curves for FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.

Abbreviations: C$, Canadian dollars; FF, fluticasone furoate; QALY, quality-adjusted life year; UMEC, umeclidinium; VI, vilanterol.
Figure 5 Net benefit acceptability curves for FF/UMEC/VI versus UMEC/VI.