253
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Impact of Lung Function and Exacerbations on Health-Related Quality of Life in COPD Patients Within One Year: Real-World Analysis Based on Claims Data

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 2637-2651 | Published online: 21 Sep 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Overview of the study population.

Abbreviations: DMP, disease management program; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; BMI, body mass index; VAS, visual analog scale; CAT, COPD Assessment Test; mMRC, Modified Medical Research Council Questionnaire.
Figure 1 Overview of the study population.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of Participants Who Experienced a Minimal Important Difference Deterioration in VAS (≥-6.9) and CAT (≥+2)

Table 2 Change in FEV1, Exacerbations and HRQoL for 3016 Patients Who Completed Both Questionnaires

Figure 2 Proportion of HRQoL change with a Minimal Important Difference (MID).

Notes: MID-Deterioration in VAS ≥–6.9/MID-Improvement in VAS ≥6.9. MID-Deterioration in CAT ≥2/MID-Improvement in CAT ≥–2.
Figure 2 Proportion of HRQoL change with a Minimal Important Difference (MID).

Figure 3 Determinants of a clinically relevant deterioration in generic HRQoL VAS (A) and disease-specific HRQoL CAT (B).

Note: *Not significant.
Abbreviations: mMRC, Modified Medical Research Council Questionnaire; VAS, visual analog scale; CAT, COPD Assessment Test.
Figure 3 Determinants of a clinically relevant deterioration in generic HRQoL VAS (A) and disease-specific HRQoL CAT (B).

Table 3 Proportion of One-Year Changes in FEV1

Figure 4 Impact of clinical indicators on HRQoL: Linear relationship between change in FEV1 and VAS (A) and CAT (B).

Notes: The estimated smooth functions of the relationship between FEV1 and HRQoL are represented by the solid curves. The shaded areas indicate the 95% confidence intervals. Generalized additive models were adjusted for age, sex, smoking status, education, BMI, number of moderate and severe exacerbation, FEV1 liter change, Charlson Comorbidity index, mMRC, and VAS/CAT baseline.
Figure 4 Impact of clinical indicators on HRQoL: Linear relationship between change in FEV1 and VAS (A) and CAT (B).

Figure 5 Change score model: impact of FEV1 on HRQoL.

Notes: Absolute adjusted mean change in VAS (A) and CAT (B) after one year. ABCD groups at baseline. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 5 Change score model: impact of FEV1 on HRQoL.

Figure 6 Change score model: impact of exacerbations on HRQoL.

Notes: Absolute adjusted mean change in VAS (A) and CAT (B) after one year. ABCD groups at baseline. Error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 6 Change score model: impact of exacerbations on HRQoL.