126
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Economic Impact of Low Adherence to COPD Management Guidelines in Spain

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 3131-3143 | Published online: 16 Nov 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Spanish population ≥ 40 years with diagnosed and treated COPD.

Notes: aNational data, for the analysis by Autonomous Communities, the population in said region was considered.
Abbreviation: COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Figure 1 Spanish population ≥ 40 years with diagnosed and treated COPD.

Figure 2 Distribution of patients considered in each GOLD group and GesEPOC phenotype in the base case analysis (A and B) and scenario analysis 1 (C), based on literature a. (A) Distribution of patients according to the GOLD strategy used in the base case analysis.Citation17 (B). Distribution of patients according to the GesEPOC guide used in the base case analysis.Citation17 (C). Distribution of patients to each GesEPOC phenotype used in scenario analysis 1.Citation9

Notes: aThe current treatment prescription patterns only take into account patients treated with the main treatments (LAMA, LABA, LAMA/LABA, LABA/ICS and LAMA/LABA/ICS).
Abbreviations: ACO, asthma-COPD overlap; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GesEPOC, Spanish Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting β2 adrenergic agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists.
Figure 2 Distribution of patients considered in each GOLD group and GesEPOC phenotype in the base case analysis (A and B) and scenario analysis 1 (C), based on literature a. (A) Distribution of patients according to the GOLD strategy used in the base case analysis.Citation17 (B). Distribution of patients according to the GesEPOC guide used in the base case analysis.Citation17 (C). Distribution of patients to each GesEPOC phenotype used in scenario analysis 1.Citation9

Figure 3 Base case analysis: current treatment patterns and proposed treatment according to GOLD (A) and GesEPOC (B) recommendations. (A) Current treatment patterns in pulmonology according to GOLD groupsCitation17 and proposed treatment patterns based on the GOLD strategy.Citation5 (B) Current treatment patterns in pulmonology according to GesEPOC phenotypesCitation17 and proposed treatment patterns based on the recommendations of the GesEPOC guidelines.Citation6

Notes: aIt was considered that 28.4% of the patients in GOLD groups C and D had eosinophilia >300 cells/µLCitation31 assuming that these patients were treated with ICS therapies. It was considered to maintain the treatment to patients with high blood eosinophils and to treat with LAMA/LABA the rest of the patients currently treated with ICS therapies. bPatients with inappropriate therapy who can be treated with more than one therapeutic option, have been distributed according to the current treatment shares of the phenotype considered.
Abbreviations: ACO, asthma-COPD overlap; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; GesEPOC, Spanish Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting β2 adrenergic agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists; Treat., treatment.
Figure 3 Base case analysis: current treatment patterns and proposed treatment according to GOLD (A) and GesEPOC (B) recommendations. (A) Current treatment patterns in pulmonology according to GOLD groupsCitation17 and proposed treatment patterns based on the GOLD strategy.Citation5 (B) Current treatment patterns in pulmonology according to GesEPOC phenotypesCitation17 and proposed treatment patterns based on the recommendations of the GesEPOC guidelines.Citation6

Table 1 Annual Pharmacological Cost Considered by Each Therapeutic Group

Table 2 COPD Patients Not Adherent to GOLD Recommendations and GesEPOC Guidelines in Pulmonology Units (Base Case Analysis)

Figure 4 Pharmaceutical expenditure and annual savings in patients treated in exclusively pulmonology services (base case analysis) (A and B) or pulmonology and primary care (scenario analysis 1) (C). (A) Following recommendations of the GOLD strategy (base case). (B) Following recommendations of the GesEPOC guide (base case). (C) Following the recommendations of the GesEPOC guide (scenario analysis 1).

Abbreviations: GesEPOC, Spanish Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting β2 adrenergic agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists.
Figure 4 Pharmaceutical expenditure and annual savings in patients treated in exclusively pulmonology services (base case analysis) (A and B) or pulmonology and primary care (scenario analysis 1) (C). (A) Following recommendations of the GOLD strategy (base case). (B) Following recommendations of the GesEPOC guide (base case). (C) Following the recommendations of the GesEPOC guide (scenario analysis 1).

Figure 5 Base case analysis: annual savings in pharmaceutical expenditure in patients treated in pulmonology services distributed by Autonomous Community according to the GOLD (A) and GesEPOC (B) guidelinesa. (A) Following GOLD strategy recommendations. (B) Following GesEPOC guideline.

Notes: aThe sum of the costs of the regions does not correspond to the total Spanish cost () as the pharmacological costs have been weighted according to their sales in each region.
Abbreviations: GesEPOC, Spanish Guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; GOLD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Figure 5 Base case analysis: annual savings in pharmaceutical expenditure in patients treated in pulmonology services distributed by Autonomous Community according to the GOLD (A) and GesEPOC (B) guidelinesa. (A) Following GOLD strategy recommendations. (B) Following GesEPOC guideline.

Table 3 COPD Patients Treated Without Following GesEPOC Guidelines in Pulmonology and Primary Care Units (Scenario Analysis 1)