252
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Different Smoking Statuses on Survival and Emphysema in Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 505-515 | Published online: 05 Mar 2022

Figures & data

Table 1 Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

Table 2 PFT Parameters

Figure 1 Comparison of two lung function test parameters and imaging parameters. (A) Comparison of FEV1/FVC and DLCO/VC. (B) Comparison of R5, R20, R5-R20. (C) Comparison of Fres and Ax. (D) Comparison of X5. (E) Comparison of LC and EI of whole lungs. (F) Comparison of MED and MLD of whole lungs. Notes: *P < 0.05 compared with NS (no smoking); #P < 0.05 compared with FS (quit smoking).

Abbreviation: FEV1/FVC the ratio of forced expiratory volume occupancy in the first second, KCO the ratio of carbon monoxide diffusion to alveolar ventilation, R5 resistance at 5 Hz, R20 resistance at 20 Hz, R5-R20 resistance at 5Hz-resistance at 20Hz, X5 reactance at 5 Hz, Fres resonant frequency, AX reactance area, EI emphysema index, MED mean emphysema density, MLD mean lung density, LC lung capacity, NS, no significance.
Figure 1 Comparison of two lung function test parameters and imaging parameters. (A) Comparison of FEV1/FVC and DLCO/VC. (B) Comparison of R5, R20, R5-R20. (C) Comparison of Fres and Ax. (D) Comparison of X5. (E) Comparison of LC and EI of whole lungs. (F) Comparison of MED and MLD of whole lungs. Notes: *P < 0.05 compared with NS (no smoking); #P < 0.05 compared with FS (quit smoking).

Table 3 Imaging Characteristics

Figure 2 (A) A 65 years old male of NS: FEV1=1.65L, FEV1/FVC=65.36%, KCO=100.6%, Z5%pred=99.7%, R5=0.28, R20=0.22, R5-R20=0.06, X5=−0.11, Fres=15.38, Ax=0.49, EI=13.68%, MLD=−841.91HU, MED=−979.35HU, LC=4823mL. (B) A 66 years old male of FS: FEV1=0.92L, FEV1/FVC=44.37%, KCO=96.5%, Z5%pred=174.3%, R5=0.46, R20=0.31, R5-R20=0.15, X5=−0.27, Fres=20.07, Ax=1.62, EI=26.85%, MLD=−850.85HU, MED=−988.4HU, LC=6004mL. (C) A 65 years old male of CS: FEV1=1.16L, FEV1/FVC=46.03%, KCO=71.9%, Z5%pred=242.5%, R5=0.64, R20=0.31, R5-R20=0.33, X5=−0.38, Fres=27.17, Ax=3.63, EI=25.19%, MLD=−874.26HU, MED=−981.88HU, LC=6905mL.

Figure 2 (A) A 65 years old male of NS: FEV1=1.65L, FEV1/FVC=65.36%, KCO=100.6%, Z5%pred=99.7%, R5=0.28, R20=0.22, R5-R20=0.06, X5=−0.11, Fres=15.38, Ax=0.49, EI=13.68%, MLD=−841.91HU, MED=−979.35HU, LC=4823mL. (B) A 66 years old male of FS: FEV1=0.92L, FEV1/FVC=44.37%, KCO=96.5%, Z5%pred=174.3%, R5=0.46, R20=0.31, R5-R20=0.15, X5=−0.27, Fres=20.07, Ax=1.62, EI=26.85%, MLD=−850.85HU, MED=−988.4HU, LC=6004mL. (C) A 65 years old male of CS: FEV1=1.16L, FEV1/FVC=46.03%, KCO=71.9%, Z5%pred=242.5%, R5=0.64, R20=0.31, R5-R20=0.33, X5=−0.38, Fres=27.17, Ax=3.63, EI=25.19%, MLD=−874.26HU, MED=−981.88HU, LC=6905mL.

Table 4 Logistic Regression Analysis of Smoking and EI

Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AECOPD patients in the NS group (n=83; 29 deaths) and all smokers AECOPD group (n=274; 91 deaths). No significant difference between the two groups was observed (log rank test, 0.113; P=0.74).

Figure 3 Kaplan–Meier survival curves for AECOPD patients in the NS group (n=83; 29 deaths) and all smokers AECOPD group (n=274; 91 deaths). No significant difference between the two groups was observed (log rank test, 0.113; P=0.74).