Figures & data
Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.
![Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.](/cms/asset/ae022f40-aedd-4150-93e2-03a7775b0678/dddt_a_12182148_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis
Figure 2 Forest plot of the estimated proportions (95% CI) for complete remission (CR) rate in patients.
![Figure 2 Forest plot of the estimated proportions (95% CI) for complete remission (CR) rate in patients.](/cms/asset/ba4f9ac5-128c-4cb2-aa2d-3eec144b8d13/dddt_a_12182148_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Forest plot of the estimated proportions (95% CI) for overall response rate (ORR) in patients.
![Figure 3 Forest plot of the estimated proportions (95% CI) for overall response rate (ORR) in patients.](/cms/asset/9f51f811-a122-46de-ac2d-14dd841fe0e8/dddt_a_12182148_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Forest plots of the estimated proportions of complete remission (CR) rate by cladribine monotherapy (A), CLAG-based chemotherapy (B), CLAG/CLAG-M chemotherapy (C), standard CLAG chemotherapy (D).
![Figure 4 Forest plots of the estimated proportions of complete remission (CR) rate by cladribine monotherapy (A), CLAG-based chemotherapy (B), CLAG/CLAG-M chemotherapy (C), standard CLAG chemotherapy (D).](/cms/asset/6be5d144-c753-4a9d-b53c-ae212e1c51e7/dddt_a_12182148_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Forest plots of the estimated proportions of complete remission (CR) rate by favorable risk (A), intermediate risk (B), unfavorable risk (C).
![Figure 5 Forest plots of the estimated proportions of complete remission (CR) rate by favorable risk (A), intermediate risk (B), unfavorable risk (C).](/cms/asset/78114e76-d772-4098-b8e9-0fcbd18bb1bf/dddt_a_12182148_f0005_b.jpg)