109
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Usefulness of a selective neutrophil elastase inhibitor, sivelestat, in acute lung injury patients with sepsis

, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 305-316 | Published online: 10 Apr 2013

Figures & data

Table 1 New scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) by the Japanese Association for Acute MedicineCitation19

Table 2 Characteristics of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) patients at the time of acute lung injury (ALI) diagnosis

Table 3 Types of infections and causative pathogens in acute lung injury patients with sepsis

Figure 1 Clinical efficacy of sivelestat for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who did or did not receive sivelestat. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Solid line, sivelestat patients; dashed line, control patients. (B and C) Clinical efficacy of sivelestat based on ventilator-free days (VFDs) and changes in PaO2/FIO2 (ΔP/F) before and 7 days after diagnosis of acute lung injury.

Note: Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Figure 1 Clinical efficacy of sivelestat for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. (A) Kaplan–Meier curves for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who did or did not receive sivelestat. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Solid line, sivelestat patients; dashed line, control patients. (B and C) Clinical efficacy of sivelestat based on ventilator-free days (VFDs) and changes in PaO2/FIO2 (ΔP/F) before and 7 days after diagnosis of acute lung injury.

Figure 2 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for survival based on the Cox proportional hazards model for assessing acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Figure 2 Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for survival based on the Cox proportional hazards model for assessing acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

Table 4 Clinical characteristics of non-septic patients and septic patients

Figure 3 Clinical efficacy of sivelestat based on ventilator-free days (VFDs) and changes in PaO2/FIO2 (ΔP/F) before and 7 days after sivelestat administration for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who were non-septic, septic, negative for procalcitonin (PCT), and positive for PCT. (A and C) VFD for patients who were non-septic, septic, negative for PCT, and positive for PCT. (B and D) ΔP/F for patients who were non-septic, septic, negative for PCT, and positive for PCT.

Notes: PCT levels higher than 0.5 ng/mL were considered PCT positive. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann–Whitney U test.
Abbreviations: Ctl, control patients; Si, sivelestat patients.
Figure 3 Clinical efficacy of sivelestat based on ventilator-free days (VFDs) and changes in PaO2/FIO2 (ΔP/F) before and 7 days after sivelestat administration for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who were non-septic, septic, negative for procalcitonin (PCT), and positive for PCT. (A and C) VFD for patients who were non-septic, septic, negative for PCT, and positive for PCT. (B and D) ΔP/F for patients who were non-septic, septic, negative for PCT, and positive for PCT.

Table 5 The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality based on univariate and multivariate Cox analysis in septic acute lung injury patients

Table 6 The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for mortality based on univariate and multivariate Cox analysis in non-septic acute lung injury patients

Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier curves for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who were septic (A), non-septic (B), positive for procalcitonin (PCT) (C), and negative for PCT (D).

Notes: PCT levels higher than 0.5 ng/mL were considered PCT positive. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Solid line, sivelestat patients; dashed line, control patients.
Figure 4 Kaplan–Meier curves for acute lung injury patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome who were septic (A), non-septic (B), positive for procalcitonin (PCT) (C), and negative for PCT (D).

Table 7 Clinical characteristics of procalcitonin (PCT)-negative patients and PCT-positive patients

Table 8 The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality based on univariate and multivariate Cox analysis in procalcitonin-positive patients