Figures & data
Figure 1 X-ray diffraction patterns for iron oxide (A) and iron oxide coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (FCMP) (B). Inset shows X-ray diffraction pattern for pure chitosan (C) and pure 6-mercaptopurine (D).
![Figure 1 X-ray diffraction patterns for iron oxide (A) and iron oxide coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (FCMP) (B). Inset shows X-ray diffraction pattern for pure chitosan (C) and pure 6-mercaptopurine (D).](/cms/asset/655c2caf-0da4-443b-99f4-e1779778b9f3/dddt_a_43035_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Fourier transform infrared spectra for (A) iron oxide nanoparticles, (B) chitosan, (C) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan, (D) pure 6-mercaptopurine, and (E) FCMP, iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.
![Figure 2 Fourier transform infrared spectra for (A) iron oxide nanoparticles, (B) chitosan, (C) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan, (D) pure 6-mercaptopurine, and (E) FCMP, iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.](/cms/asset/3b9d8427-0787-4693-8caa-2a2a5860c718/dddt_a_43035_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 Magnetic properties of Fe3O4 magnetite nanoparticles and FCMP
Figure 3 Magnetization plots of (A) iron oxide magnetite nanoparticles and (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.
![Figure 3 Magnetization plots of (A) iron oxide magnetite nanoparticles and (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.](/cms/asset/45a8adb2-e057-4ba6-8e48-3cbf4d34f49a/dddt_a_43035_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Thermogravimetry analyses of (A) 6-mercaptopurine and (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.
![Figure 4 Thermogravimetry analyses of (A) 6-mercaptopurine and (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine.](/cms/asset/54e12835-aa57-4d68-a1bc-ad6c7d05901d/dddt_a_43035_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Transmission electron micrographs for (A) iron oxide magnetite nanoparticles (200 nm bar), (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (200 nm bar), particle size distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (C) and particle size distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (D).
![Figure 5 Transmission electron micrographs for (A) iron oxide magnetite nanoparticles (200 nm bar), (B) iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (200 nm bar), particle size distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles (C) and particle size distribution of iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine (D).](/cms/asset/5bb43985-b2ae-454e-9a6b-f38cad98ecf4/dddt_a_43035_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 (A) Release profiles for physical mixtures of 6-mercaptopurine and (B) 6-mercaptopurine from iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in hot ethanol into (I) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 4.8, (II) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 7.4, and (C) release profiles for 6-mercaptopurine from the iron oxide nanoparticles containing the same amounts of chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide into (III) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 4.8 and (IV) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 7.4.
![Figure 6 (A) Release profiles for physical mixtures of 6-mercaptopurine and (B) 6-mercaptopurine from iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in hot ethanol into (I) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 4.8, (II) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 7.4, and (C) release profiles for 6-mercaptopurine from the iron oxide nanoparticles containing the same amounts of chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide into (III) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 4.8 and (IV) phosphate-buffered solution at pH 7.4.](/cms/asset/57a5106c-602c-4205-a8ae-6abf5ff51b9b/dddt_a_43035_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 2 Correlation coefficient, rate constant, and elimination half-life obtained by fitting the data for release of MP and MP-D from FCMP and FCMP-D into phosphate-buffered solution at pH 4.8 and pH 7.4
Figure 7 Fitting the data for 6-mercaptopurine release from iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in hot ethanol into different solutions to the pseudo-second order kinetics for pH 4.8 (A) and pH 7.4 (B) and fitting data of 6-mercaptopurine released from the iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide into different solutions to the pseudo-second order kinetics for pH 4.8 (C) and first order kinetics for pH 7.4 (D).
![Figure 7 Fitting the data for 6-mercaptopurine release from iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in hot ethanol into different solutions to the pseudo-second order kinetics for pH 4.8 (A) and pH 7.4 (B) and fitting data of 6-mercaptopurine released from the iron oxide nanoparticles coated with chitosan and 6-mercaptopurine dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide into different solutions to the pseudo-second order kinetics for pH 4.8 (C) and first order kinetics for pH 7.4 (D).](/cms/asset/5752ee89-dcab-4195-8ef8-e748bea910a2/dddt_a_43035_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 Viability assays for (A) normal mouse fibroblast (3T3) and (B) leukemia (WEHI-3) cell lines and anticancer activity of FCMP, FCMP-D, FNPs, and pure 6-MP, respectively, after 72 hours of treatment. The IC50 was 4.94 ± 0.76 μg/mL, 11.94 ± 0.45 μg/mL, 47.56 ± 2.13 μg/mL, and 0.60 ± 0.18 μg/mL for cancer cells exposed to FCMP, FCMP-D, FNPs, and pure 6-MP, respectively.
![Figure 8 Viability assays for (A) normal mouse fibroblast (3T3) and (B) leukemia (WEHI-3) cell lines and anticancer activity of FCMP, FCMP-D, FNPs, and pure 6-MP, respectively, after 72 hours of treatment. The IC50 was 4.94 ± 0.76 μg/mL, 11.94 ± 0.45 μg/mL, 47.56 ± 2.13 μg/mL, and 0.60 ± 0.18 μg/mL for cancer cells exposed to FCMP, FCMP-D, FNPs, and pure 6-MP, respectively.](/cms/asset/fc950d14-c236-4369-8a72-9150990342a5/dddt_a_43035_f0008_c.jpg)