169
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Immunosuppression with Generics in Liver and Kidney Transplantation: A Real-World Evidence Study

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 53-69 | Received 07 Sep 2023, Accepted 22 Dec 2023, Published online: 11 Jan 2024

Figures & data

Table 1 Branded and Generic Version of Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine and Mycophenolate

Figure 1 Study eligibility criteria by kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 1 Study eligibility criteria by kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 2 Generic and branded users of TAC, CsA and MYC by year in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 2 Generic and branded users of TAC, CsA and MYC by year in kidney and liver transplantation.

Table 2 Transplant, Recipient and Donor Characteristics According to Generic/Branded Version by Active Ingredient in Kidney and Liver Transplantation

Table 3 Proportion of Patients Treated with Generic Version for TAC, CsA and MYC Over Time by Region in Kidney and Liver Transplantation

Figure 3 (A-C) Hospital variability in patients treated with generic drugs by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 3 (A-C) Hospital variability in patients treated with generic drugs by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 4 Proportion of patients changing drug version within one year from starting therapy by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 4 Proportion of patients changing drug version within one year from starting therapy by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 5 Proportion of patients changing drug version within two years from starting therapy by active in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 5 Proportion of patients changing drug version within two years from starting therapy by active in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 6 Risk-benefit profile of generic versus branded by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Figure 6 Risk-benefit profile of generic versus branded by active ingredient in kidney and liver transplantation.

Table 4 Sensitivity Analysis Adjusting for Immunosuppressive Therapies Used in Combination with the Exposure

Figure 7 Saving of one year of immunosuppressive therapy with generics compared to branded.

Figure 7 Saving of one year of immunosuppressive therapy with generics compared to branded.