Figures & data
Figure 1 Study recruitment diagram. Patient selection for evaluating associations between lifestyle habits and adverse health outcomes in propensity score (PS)-matched subjects who gained ≥10 kg versus <10 kg after age 20 years is summarized in the study flowchart. The PS-matched analysis was conducted employing the following covariates: age, sex, and BMI at the time of the study. We used 0.1 times the pooled standard deviation of the logit of the PS as the caliper width for the PS matching.
![Figure 1 Study recruitment diagram. Patient selection for evaluating associations between lifestyle habits and adverse health outcomes in propensity score (PS)-matched subjects who gained ≥10 kg versus <10 kg after age 20 years is summarized in the study flowchart. The PS-matched analysis was conducted employing the following covariates: age, sex, and BMI at the time of the study. We used 0.1 times the pooled standard deviation of the logit of the PS as the caliper width for the PS matching.](/cms/asset/b0cd9b63-acbb-4349-b192-32d77064e6cd/dmso_a_12185010_f0001_b.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics of the Study Participants
Table 2 The Comparison of the Number of Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors by Weight Gain After 20 Years of Age
Table 3 Odds Ratios of Metabolic Disorder Prevalences from Multivariable Logistic Regression Model Associated with Weight Gain ≥10kg After 20 Years of Age vs Weight Gain <10kg
Table 4 The Comparison of Lifestyle Factors by Weight Gain After 20 Years of Age
Table 5 Odds Ratios of Lifestyle Factors from Multivariable Logistic Regression Model Associated with Weight Gain ≥10kg After 20 Years of Age vs Weight Gain <10kg