Figures & data
Figure 1 Population selection flow diagram.
![Figure 1 Population selection flow diagram.](/cms/asset/1492b94c-920a-4b01-af3b-56051047d8ef/dmso_a_356001_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus assessment of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) which was marked by the red arrow.
![Figure 2 Ultrasound diagnostic apparatus assessment of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) which was marked by the red arrow.](/cms/asset/987ef6d3-c639-40b5-8a3c-dc9b3e46c29e/dmso_a_356001_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the EAT for predicting arterial stiffness.
![Figure 3 The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the EAT for predicting arterial stiffness.](/cms/asset/c0c2fc81-4857-431f-8cc3-ccbc03904420/dmso_a_356001_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1 Characteristics of the Study Population According to EAT Thickness
Table 2 Correlation Analysis Among Epicardial Fat Thickness, baPWV, and Other Variables
Table 3 Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis for the Effect of Epicardial Fat Thickness on the Absolute Value of baPWV