Figures & data
Table 1 Comparison of the Clinical Parameters of the 4 SUA Groups
Figure 1 Comparison of TyG and HOMA-IR between male and female patients. (A) Comparison of TyG between male and female patients; (B) Comparison of HOMA-IR between male and female patients. *P < 0.05.
![Figure 1 Comparison of TyG and HOMA-IR between male and female patients. (A) Comparison of TyG between male and female patients; (B) Comparison of HOMA-IR between male and female patients. *P < 0.05.](/cms/asset/f2e770d0-66cd-4a2a-ad61-a79a858e172b/dmso_a_12149923_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Comparison of SUA between FL subgroups and BMI subgroups. (A) Comparison of SUA between NFL group and FL group; (B) Comparison of SUA between non-overweight group and overweight group. **P < 0.01.
![Figure 2 Comparison of SUA between FL subgroups and BMI subgroups. (A) Comparison of SUA between NFL group and FL group; (B) Comparison of SUA between non-overweight group and overweight group. **P < 0.01.](/cms/asset/9a25bb5f-3a75-4c39-a882-82968c924489/dmso_a_12149923_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Correlation Between the SUA and Other Factors
Table 3 Logistic Regression Analysis of TyG and HUA
Table 4 The Diagnostic Value of TyG and HOMA-IR for HUA in Non-Obese Patients with T2DM