Figures & data
Figure 1 Design and workflow of the study.
![Figure 1 Design and workflow of the study.](/cms/asset/f56faf7b-91db-49ee-af46-f62fc9cc752f/dmso_a_12157455_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Identification of inflammatory response-related differentially methylated sites (IRRDMSs). (A) The venn diagram showed the intersection of methylation-related genes and inflammatory response-related genes. (B) The volcano map of IRRDMSs between the group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%); (C) The Sankey diagram linked inflammatory response-related genes to IRRDMSs.
![Figure 2 Identification of inflammatory response-related differentially methylated sites (IRRDMSs). (A) The venn diagram showed the intersection of methylation-related genes and inflammatory response-related genes. (B) The volcano map of IRRDMSs between the group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%); (C) The Sankey diagram linked inflammatory response-related genes to IRRDMSs.](/cms/asset/cbf1bd3e-9cb3-41e2-945a-4d3fc78a3f26/dmso_a_12157455_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Genomic features of inflammatory response-related differentially methylated sites between group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%). (A) Distribution of the hypermethylated differentially methylated CpG sites across the annotated gene regions; (B) Distribution of the hypomethylated differentially methylated CpG sites across the annotated gene regions; (C) Distribution of the hypermethylated differentially methylated CpG sites in relation to CpG islands; (D) Distribution of the hypomethylated differentially methylated CpG sites in relation to CpG islands.
![Figure 3 Genomic features of inflammatory response-related differentially methylated sites between group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%). (A) Distribution of the hypermethylated differentially methylated CpG sites across the annotated gene regions; (B) Distribution of the hypomethylated differentially methylated CpG sites across the annotated gene regions; (C) Distribution of the hypermethylated differentially methylated CpG sites in relation to CpG islands; (D) Distribution of the hypomethylated differentially methylated CpG sites in relation to CpG islands.](/cms/asset/9962c326-c9e2-4fb9-a16c-aa1dec7b525b/dmso_a_12157455_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Identification of hub methylation sites. (A) LASSO coefficient profiles of 200 genes; (B) Cross-validation for choosing tuning parameter of LASSO model; (C) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg03610073 was significantly positively correlated one-year EWL% after LSG; (D) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg03208951 was significantly negatively correlated one year EWL% after LSG; (E) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg18746357 was significantly positively correlated one-year EWL% after LSG; (F) Box plots showed statistically significant differences in β-values for the 3 hub methylation sites between group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%); (G) ROC curve showed the potential of cg03610073, cg03208951, and cg18746357 predicting EWL% at one year following LSG.
![Figure 4 Identification of hub methylation sites. (A) LASSO coefficient profiles of 200 genes; (B) Cross-validation for choosing tuning parameter of LASSO model; (C) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg03610073 was significantly positively correlated one-year EWL% after LSG; (D) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg03208951 was significantly negatively correlated one year EWL% after LSG; (E) The results of the correlation analysis showed that cg18746357 was significantly positively correlated one-year EWL% after LSG; (F) Box plots showed statistically significant differences in β-values for the 3 hub methylation sites between group-B (EWL%<50%) and group-A (EWL%≥50%); (G) ROC curve showed the potential of cg03610073, cg03208951, and cg18746357 predicting EWL% at one year following LSG.](/cms/asset/297c82ab-51f4-4637-b4f3-fd8b98d73f91/dmso_a_12157455_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Establishment and evaluation of nomogram. (A) The nomogram, based on the 3 hub methylation sites, for predicting EWL% at one year following LSG; (B) The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the potential of the nomogram in predicting EWL% at one year following LSG; (C) Calibration curves of the nomogram. (D) Decision curve analysis of the nomogram.
![Figure 5 Establishment and evaluation of nomogram. (A) The nomogram, based on the 3 hub methylation sites, for predicting EWL% at one year following LSG; (B) The receiver operating characteristic curve showed the potential of the nomogram in predicting EWL% at one year following LSG; (C) Calibration curves of the nomogram. (D) Decision curve analysis of the nomogram.](/cms/asset/30bb874f-0822-4739-bc01-215828c15b2e/dmso_a_12157455_f0005_c.jpg)