Figures & data
Table 1 Characteristics of the Participants with and without NAFLD
Table 2 Logistic Regression Analyses for the Association Between Six IR Surrogates and NAFLD
Figure 1 Relationship of TyG, TyG-BMI, LAP, VAI, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR with the risk of NAFLD for all participants. ORs are adjusted for age, sex, marital status, smoking, physical exercise, SBP, RHR.
![Figure 1 Relationship of TyG, TyG-BMI, LAP, VAI, TG/HDL-C and METS-IR with the risk of NAFLD for all participants. ORs are adjusted for age, sex, marital status, smoking, physical exercise, SBP, RHR.](/cms/asset/b8bdc92b-172c-444b-a65d-050173c0e1d6/dmso_a_12158164_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 3 AUCs for Insulin Resistance Surrogates in Relation to NAFLD
Figure 2 The receiver operating characteristic curve of insulin resistance surrogates and HSI after adjusting for age, sex, marital status, smoking, physical exercise, SBP, RHR.
![Figure 2 The receiver operating characteristic curve of insulin resistance surrogates and HSI after adjusting for age, sex, marital status, smoking, physical exercise, SBP, RHR.](/cms/asset/3245dbd7-0377-4f08-a9c8-85353a2120d4/dmso_a_12158164_f0002_c.jpg)