Figures & data
Table 1 Comparisons of Clinical Characteristics of T2DM Patients with Different eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) Levels
Figure 2 Comparisons of UA, UA/CR and UHR levels among different eGFR groups. Bars are shown as means ± SDs. * and ** denote significance at P value of <0.001 and <0.05, respectively.
![Figure 2 Comparisons of UA, UA/CR and UHR levels among different eGFR groups. Bars are shown as means ± SDs. * and ** denote significance at P value of <0.001 and <0.05, respectively.](/cms/asset/fd6fa8e1-b475-4cac-91ac-1e355d9a5957/dmso_a_12295305_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Spearman Correlation of UA, UA/CR and UHR with Clinical Variables
Table 3 Logistic Regression Analysis of UA, UA/CR and UHR for DKD
Table 4 Logistic Regression Analysis of UA, UA/CR and UHR for Kidney Impairment in Patients with T2DM
Data Sharing Statement
All data are included in the manuscript.