Figures & data
Box 1 Metabolic Risk Abnormalities - 2 Out of 7
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Participants
Figure 1 The percentage of liver fibrosis risk divided by the FIB-4 score in the normal, non-obstructive, and CAD groups. The percentage of high FIB-4 score were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the other two groups (p<0.01).
![Figure 1 The percentage of liver fibrosis risk divided by the FIB-4 score in the normal, non-obstructive, and CAD groups. The percentage of high FIB-4 score were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the other two groups (p<0.01).](/cms/asset/7ece24af-2f0a-432e-8657-e69ccd10fe32/dmso_a_12295141_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 The percentage of liver fibrosis risk divided by the NFS in the normal, non-obstructive, and CAD groups. The percentage of high NFS were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the other two groups (p<0.01).
![Figure 2 The percentage of liver fibrosis risk divided by the NFS in the normal, non-obstructive, and CAD groups. The percentage of high NFS were significantly higher in the CAD group than in the other two groups (p<0.01).](/cms/asset/dbac22e7-9704-4f07-8f59-b4ac6c92d2c2/dmso_a_12295141_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Factors Associated with CAD in Subjects with MAFLD: Logistic Regression
Table 3 Associations of Noninvasive Fibrosis Scores with CAD in Subjects with MAFLD: Logistic Regression
Table 4 Correlation of Liver Fibrosis Scores with Clinical Parameters: Correlation Analysis