Figures & data
Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of Pulmonary Infection and Non-Pulmonary Infection
Table 2 Detection Rate of Organism of Pulmonary Infection in mNGS Compared with Traditional Detection Method
Figure 2 The bar chart shows the comparison of positive results between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and traditional pathogen detection in the pulmonary infection group and non-pulmonary infection group.
![Figure 2 The bar chart shows the comparison of positive results between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and traditional pathogen detection in the pulmonary infection group and non-pulmonary infection group.](/cms/asset/49c00843-3d2d-44f9-bc0b-798feb0b9136/didr_a_235182_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 3 Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity Between mNGS and Traditional Detection Method
Table 4 Infection Status of All Patients at a 1-Month Follow-Up According to the Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Result