501
Views
58
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing versus Traditional Pathogen Detection in the Diagnosis of Peripheral Pulmonary Infectious Lesions

, , ORCID Icon, , , & show all
Pages 567-576 | Published online: 19 Feb 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1 Detailing the characteristic of patient samples.

Figure 1 Detailing the characteristic of patient samples.

Table 1 Demographic Characteristics of Pulmonary Infection and Non-Pulmonary Infection

Table 2 Detection Rate of Organism of Pulmonary Infection in mNGS Compared with Traditional Detection Method

Figure 2 The bar chart shows the comparison of positive results between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and traditional pathogen detection in the pulmonary infection group and non-pulmonary infection group.

Figure 2 The bar chart shows the comparison of positive results between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and traditional pathogen detection in the pulmonary infection group and non-pulmonary infection group.

Table 3 Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity Between mNGS and Traditional Detection Method

Table 4 Infection Status of All Patients at a 1-Month Follow-Up According to the Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing Result