Antimicrobial Resistance and Genotyping of Bacteria Isolated from Urinary Tract Infection in Children in an Iranian Referral Hospital

Figures & data

Table 1 The Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern in Gram Negative Bacteria Isolated from UTIs

Gram Negative Bacteria	Total	Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole	Nitrofurantoin	Piperacillin/Tazobactam	Amikacin	Gentamycin	Cefepime	Cefotaxime	Imipenem	Ceftazidime
	N	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)
E. coli	118	81 (69)	9 (8)	20 (17)	3 (2/5)	21 (18)	67 (57)	74 (63)	–	–
K. pneumoniae	30	11 (37)	15 (50)	14 (47)	10 (33)	7 (23)	15 (50)	18 (60)	–	–
P. aeroginosa	13	–	–	1 (8)	0	1 (8)	1 (8)	–	2 (15)	1 (8)
E. aerogenes	3	0	3 (100)	–	0	1 (33)	1 (33)	–	–	–
B. cepacia complex	6	0	–	2 (33)	6 (100)	6 (100)	4 (67)	–	6 (100)	0
K. oxytoca	3	1 (33)	0	1 (33)	1 (33)	1 (33)	1 (33)	–	–	–

Table 2 The Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Pattern in Gram Positive Bacteria Isolated from UTIs

Gram Positive Bacteria	Total	Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole	Nitrofurantoin	Piperacillin/Tazobactam	Ampicillin	Gentamycin	Vancomycin	Penicillin	Imipenem	Meticillin
	N	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)	N (%)
E. faecium	13	–	3 (23)	5 of 12 (42)	5 of 12 (42)	3 of 3 (100)	3 (23)	8 (61/5)	3 (23)	–
S. epidermidis	5	2 (40)	0	–	–	–	0	4 (80)	–	4 (80)

Figure 1 Genotyping of E. coli (A), K. pneumoniae (B), B. cepacia complex (C), and E. faecium strains (D) that met hospital-acquired infection criteria using RAPD-PCR.