Figures & data
Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of the Participants
Figure 1 Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Red, significantly up-regulated gene; green, significantly down-regulated gene; gray, non-significantly differently expressed gene.
![Figure 1 Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Red, significantly up-regulated gene; green, significantly down-regulated gene; gray, non-significantly differently expressed gene.](/cms/asset/db098a8c-a7a7-446e-a5b1-b45d68938d1b/didr_a_278705_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Bubble diagram of top 20 enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways for significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ATB and HD. (A) Top 20 ranked GO terms of up-regulated DEGs. (B) Top 20 ranked GO terms of down-regulated DEGs. (C) Top 20 pathways of up-regulated DEGs. (D) Top 20 pathways of down-regulated DEGs. Rich factor: the ratio of genes enriched in the GO term (KEGG) to the number of annotation genes, the enrichment degree was stronger with a bigger Rich factor. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term (KEGG).
![Figure 2 Bubble diagram of top 20 enriched GO terms and KEGG pathways for significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ATB and HD. (A) Top 20 ranked GO terms of up-regulated DEGs. (B) Top 20 ranked GO terms of down-regulated DEGs. (C) Top 20 pathways of up-regulated DEGs. (D) Top 20 pathways of down-regulated DEGs. Rich factor: the ratio of genes enriched in the GO term (KEGG) to the number of annotation genes, the enrichment degree was stronger with a bigger Rich factor. The size of dots indicates the number of genes in the GO term (KEGG).](/cms/asset/d2095887-4113-4312-baee-dde8036abe48/didr_a_278705_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Top 2 modules of PPI sub-network by MCODE in Cytoscape software. (A) module 1; (B) module 2.
![Figure 3 Top 2 modules of PPI sub-network by MCODE in Cytoscape software. (A) module 1; (B) module 2.](/cms/asset/409e147d-ca15-40dc-ae1f-7b1ab5a52750/didr_a_278705_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2 Differentially Expressed miRNAs (DEM) in ATB Compared with HDs
Figure 4 Intersection genes between DEGs and target gene of DEMs. DEGs, significantly differentially expressed genes (mRNA) between ATB and HD; DEMs, significantly differentially expressed genes (miRNA) between ATB and HD.
![Figure 4 Intersection genes between DEGs and target gene of DEMs. DEGs, significantly differentially expressed genes (mRNA) between ATB and HD; DEMs, significantly differentially expressed genes (miRNA) between ATB and HD.](/cms/asset/282424e3-1013-44d6-b17e-9be721a52a0f/didr_a_278705_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 MiRNA-mRNA regulatory network was analyzed using Cytoscape software. Diamond-shaped represents miRNAs, and circular nodes represent target genes. Red, up-regulated miRNA or mRNA; green, down-regulated miRNA or mRNA in active tuberculosis subjects.
![Figure 5 MiRNA-mRNA regulatory network was analyzed using Cytoscape software. Diamond-shaped represents miRNAs, and circular nodes represent target genes. Red, up-regulated miRNA or mRNA; green, down-regulated miRNA or mRNA in active tuberculosis subjects.](/cms/asset/d86719ab-cc75-4250-880d-200c1a491092/didr_a_278705_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 We analyzed the expression of five miRNAs (hsa-miR-23a-5p, hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-193a-5p and hsa-miR-941 and hsa-miR-16-1-3p) in 35 active tuberculosis patients versus 35 healthy donors. U6 was used as reference gene. 2-ΔΔCt method was used to quantify RT-qPCR data. Mann–Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences between groups. P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
![Figure 6 We analyzed the expression of five miRNAs (hsa-miR-23a-5p, hsa-miR-183-5p, hsa-miR-193a-5p and hsa-miR-941 and hsa-miR-16-1-3p) in 35 active tuberculosis patients versus 35 healthy donors. U6 was used as reference gene. 2-ΔΔCt method was used to quantify RT-qPCR data. Mann–Whitney test was used to evaluate the differences between groups. P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.](/cms/asset/9baaab43-f067-482a-8f30-ebc812780531/didr_a_278705_f0006_b.jpg)