234
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

In vitro and in vivo Effect of Antimicrobial Agent Combinations Against Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with Different Resistance Mechanisms in China

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , & show all
Pages 917-928 | Published online: 05 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 The difference in MIC values between different types of carbapenemase. (A) Meropenem (MEM); (B) tigecycline (TGC); (C) colistin (COL); (D) amikacin (AK).

Notes: ***p<0.001; **p<0.01.
Figure 1 The difference in MIC values between different types of carbapenemase. (A) Meropenem (MEM); (B) tigecycline (TGC); (C) colistin (COL); (D) amikacin (AK).

Table 1 Isolates Used in the Time–Kill Assay and G. mellonella Survival Assay

Table 2 Susceptibility of 58 Clinical CRKps to Four Antimicrobial Agents

Table 3 In vitro Combination Effect of Different Regimens Against CRKps with Different Resistance Mechanisms Using the Checkerboard Assay

Figure 2 In vitro time–kill assay using meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), tigecycline (TGC) and amikacin (AK), either alone or in combination, against six CRKps with different resistance mechanisms

Figure 2 In vitro time–kill assay using meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), tigecycline (TGC) and amikacin (AK), either alone or in combination, against six CRKps with different resistance mechanisms

Figure 3 Survival rate of infected Galleria mellonella larvae treated with different drugs: meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), tigecycline (TGC) and amikacin (AK), or mock-inoculated with sterile saline (controls).

Figure 3 Survival rate of infected Galleria mellonella larvae treated with different drugs: meropenem (MEM), colistin (COL), tigecycline (TGC) and amikacin (AK), or mock-inoculated with sterile saline (controls).