287
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Fungal Infection Diagnosis: Lung Biopsy versus Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 4333-4359 | Published online: 20 Oct 2021

Figures & data

Table 1 Patient Demographic Characteristics

Figure 1 Methods used to diagnose pulmonary fungal infections.

Figure 1 Methods used to diagnose pulmonary fungal infections.

Table 3 Performance of mNGS and the Conventional Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Fungal Infections

Table 4 Comparison of the ROC for mNGS and the Conventional Tests

Table 5 Comparison of the Difference in the AUC

Figure 2 Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves.

Abbreviation: ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Figure 2 Pairwise comparison of the ROC curves.

Figure 3 (A) Fungi detected using lung biopsy-mNGS. (B) Fungi detected using BALF-mNGS.

Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 3 (A) Fungi detected using lung biopsy-mNGS. (B) Fungi detected using BALF-mNGS.

Figure 4 Consistency of the two specimens for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections. The pie chart shows the positive distribution of 106 cases investigated for pulmonary fungal infections using lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Among the patients whose mNGS results matched for both specimens, the mNGS results of nine patients showed partial matches, 24 patients showed complete matches, but 54 patients had false-positive results.

Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 4 Consistency of the two specimens for mNGS in diagnosing pulmonary fungal infections. The pie chart shows the positive distribution of 106 cases investigated for pulmonary fungal infections using lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Among the patients whose mNGS results matched for both specimens, the mNGS results of nine patients showed partial matches, 24 patients showed complete matches, but 54 patients had false-positive results.

Table 6 Results of the 32 Patients with Matching mNGS Results

Figure 5 Comparison of the fungal reads detected by lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Multiple interval: mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads.

Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 5 Comparison of the fungal reads detected by lung biopsy and BALF for mNGS. Multiple interval: mNGS (Biopsy) most detected fungal reads/mNGS (BAL) most detected fungal reads.

Figure 6 Comparison of the fungal reads detected by mNGS with matching results from both specimens in 32 patients.

Abbreviation: mNGS, metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 6 Comparison of the fungal reads detected by mNGS with matching results from both specimens in 32 patients.

Table 7 Sequencing Results for 22 Patients with Inconsistent Lung Biopsy-mNGS and BALF-mNGS