Figures & data
Table 1 Clinical Characteristics of the Included Patients
Figure 1 Diagnostic classification of the study participants.
![Figure 1 Diagnostic classification of the study participants.](/cms/asset/5b5be8ea-761f-48ef-a51b-0fb7999916e6/didr_a_350570_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Venn diagram of positive tests. (A) All specimens. (B) Tissue specimens. (C) Core needle biopsy specimens.
![Figure 2 Venn diagram of positive tests. (A) All specimens. (B) Tissue specimens. (C) Core needle biopsy specimens.](/cms/asset/657e7133-7732-4ff4-940f-219ff2a52ad9/didr_a_350570_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Accuracy of Pathology, Molecular Tests, and Parallel Test (Positive Result for Either of the Two Assays) for the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis Against a Composite Reference Standard
Table 3 Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficiency Between Pathology, Molecular Tests, and Parallel Test for the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis
Table 4 Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficiency of Pathology, Molecular Tests, and Parallel Test Using Different Specimen Types for the Diagnosis of Lymph Node Tuberculosis