Figures & data
Figure 2 Characteristics of the used ivermectin nanosuspension. (A) Particle size distribution. (B) Transmission electron micrograph of the prepared ivermectin nanosuspension.
![Figure 2 Characteristics of the used ivermectin nanosuspension. (A) Particle size distribution. (B) Transmission electron micrograph of the prepared ivermectin nanosuspension.](/cms/asset/186ad5d2-c3c8-4d6e-9a92-12058164afe2/didr_a_381715_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 In-vitro release profiles of ivermectin from mucoadhesive nanosuspension in SNF (simulated nasal fluid) pH 5.5 at 37 °C. Data expressed at mean ± SD (n=3).
![Figure 3 In-vitro release profiles of ivermectin from mucoadhesive nanosuspension in SNF (simulated nasal fluid) pH 5.5 at 37 °C. Data expressed at mean ± SD (n=3).](/cms/asset/a0d09b1a-660c-42b7-b05f-1ec15775b269/didr_a_381715_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Data of the Study Groups
Table 2 Comparison Between the Study Groups Regarding to Anosmia Recovery at Different Follow Up Durations
Figure 4 Comparision between the study groups according to the percentage (%) of recovery of anosmia in different follow up durations (after one week, one month, two months and three months).
![Figure 4 Comparision between the study groups according to the percentage (%) of recovery of anosmia in different follow up durations (after one week, one month, two months and three months).](/cms/asset/3f0aff82-0054-4c88-9409-95b13ad640ff/didr_a_381715_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3 Comparison Between the Total Duration of Anosmia Till Recovery in the Study Groups