Figures & data
Figure 1 (A) The measurement method of M/S value. (B) Nodules in the figure were all NG. (C) The larger nodule in the figure was FTC.
![Figure 1 (A) The measurement method of M/S value. (B) Nodules in the figure were all NG. (C) The larger nodule in the figure was FTC.](/cms/asset/3934f61e-4162-43ba-980c-eba6cb4cc13f/dijg_a_12168083_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Differential Analysis of Clinical and Ultrasonographic Features Between FTN and NG
Figure 2 The clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of FTN and NG.
![Figure 2 The clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of FTN and NG.](/cms/asset/8a1f170a-98d0-47b2-8b6a-c06612630e2f/dijg_a_12168083_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Differential Analysis of Clinical and Ultrasonographic Features Between FTC and FA
Table 3 Differential Analysis of M/S Values Between FTN (Including FTC and FA) and NG
Figure 3 (A) Difference of M/S values in FTN and nodular goiter. (B) Difference of M/S values in FTC and FA.
![Figure 3 (A) Difference of M/S values in FTN and nodular goiter. (B) Difference of M/S values in FTC and FA.](/cms/asset/e2bed77a-53be-48e4-aba3-9904096ba4c8/dijg_a_12168083_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 (A) The predictive value of M/S value in thyroid ultrasonography. (B) Corresponding relationship between two kinds of thyroid nodules with M/S value. (C) The distribution of FTN and NG with M/S values in 422 thyroid target nodules.
![Figure 4 (A) The predictive value of M/S value in thyroid ultrasonography. (B) Corresponding relationship between two kinds of thyroid nodules with M/S value. (C) The distribution of FTN and NG with M/S values in 422 thyroid target nodules.](/cms/asset/2323baf0-b441-4f02-821f-1dfa5430f7e7/dijg_a_12168083_f0004_c.jpg)