Figures & data
Table 1 Clinicopathologic Characteristics According to Expression Level of LIPH in TCGA Databases
Table 2 Clinicopathologic Characteristics According to Expression Level of LIPH in METABRIC Databases
Figure 1 LIPH expression pattern in breast cancer in TCGA database (A–H). (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001).
![Figure 1 LIPH expression pattern in breast cancer in TCGA database (A–H). (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001).](/cms/asset/a12a7eae-6d45-4b03-94e0-0ad62fb15a1a/dijg_a_12168470_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Survival curves according to the expression level of LIPH using TCGA (A, C–H) and METABRIC (B) databases. PAM50: A 50-gene signature that classifies breast cancer into five molecular intrinsic subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like, and Normal-like. Luminal A subtype (ER or PR positive, or both, HER2 negative); luminal B subtype (ER or PR positive, or both, HER2 negative); HER2 subtype (HER2 positive, ER or PR negative or positive); Basal subtype (HER2 negative and ER and PR negative).
![Figure 2 Survival curves according to the expression level of LIPH using TCGA (A, C–H) and METABRIC (B) databases. PAM50: A 50-gene signature that classifies breast cancer into five molecular intrinsic subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched, Basal-like, and Normal-like. Luminal A subtype (ER or PR positive, or both, HER2 negative); luminal B subtype (ER or PR positive, or both, HER2 negative); HER2 subtype (HER2 positive, ER or PR negative or positive); Basal subtype (HER2 negative and ER and PR negative).](/cms/asset/e120abb4-c21e-4527-87f2-a52baa26fbc4/dijg_a_12168470_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Survival curves according to the expression level of LIPH in each subtype of breast cancer using METABRIC database (A–F).
![Figure 3 Survival curves according to the expression level of LIPH in each subtype of breast cancer using METABRIC database (A–F).](/cms/asset/614c510d-6770-47ff-8b5a-d07200548500/dijg_a_12168470_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 3 Univariable Analyses Regarding Proportion Alive Using TCGA Databases
Table 4 Univariable Analyses Regarding Proportion Alive Using METABRIC Databases
Figure 4 Immunohistochemistry staining of LIPH in the normal breast tissue (A) and breast cancer (B).
![Figure 4 Immunohistochemistry staining of LIPH in the normal breast tissue (A) and breast cancer (B).](/cms/asset/e7db957e-e3be-4906-8bc9-89638f278691/dijg_a_12168470_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Correlation landscape of LIPH expression and immune cell infiltration in pan-cancer.
![Figure 5 Correlation landscape of LIPH expression and immune cell infiltration in pan-cancer.](/cms/asset/26a20204-e249-4f19-8cf2-63422b4550e7/dijg_a_12168470_f0005_c.jpg)