Figures & data
Figure 1 Sanger sequencing for validation of the variations detected by the next-generation sequencing platforms. (A) ATP6V0A4 c.1418C>T variant in family members of Individual 1. (B) POU1F1 c.416G>A (p. Arg139Gln) variant in family of Individual 1.
![Figure 1 Sanger sequencing for validation of the variations detected by the next-generation sequencing platforms. (A) ATP6V0A4 c.1418C>T variant in family members of Individual 1. (B) POU1F1 c.416G>A (p. Arg139Gln) variant in family of Individual 1.](/cms/asset/055ef556-a53f-446c-93ec-4ca05be409ac/dijg_a_12159654_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Sanger sequencing for validation of the variations detected by the next-generation sequencing platforms. POU1F1 c.212C>T variant in family members of Individual 2.
![Figure 2 Sanger sequencing for validation of the variations detected by the next-generation sequencing platforms. POU1F1 c.212C>T variant in family members of Individual 2.](/cms/asset/f504d155-af0d-43bf-bede-106d02190817/dijg_a_12159654_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 Evaluation and Classification of the Three Genetic Variants Detected by WES
Figure 3 CMA testing result of Individual 1. A 24 Mb heterozygous deletion (LOH: loss of heterozygosity) in the 2p12.1p13.13 region was detected.
![Figure 3 CMA testing result of Individual 1. A 24 Mb heterozygous deletion (LOH: loss of heterozygosity) in the 2p12.1p13.13 region was detected.](/cms/asset/c3d85791-d070-46c8-afd0-387e016128d0/dijg_a_12159654_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2 Clinical Features, Laboratory results in Seven Individuals