116
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiology

Intramyocardial Hemorrhage Leads to Higher MACE Rate by Increasing Myocardial Infarction Volume in Patients with STEMI

, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 275-285 | Received 25 Oct 2023, Accepted 18 Jan 2024, Published online: 24 Jan 2024

Figures & data

Table 1 Clinical Features of Patients According to IMH

Table 2 Laboratory Examination and Cardiac Parameters According to IMH

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier curve showing the risk of MACE according to the presence or absence of IMH.

Figure 1 Kaplan–Meier curve showing the risk of MACE according to the presence or absence of IMH.

Table 3 Patient Characteristics According to Major Adverse Cardiac Events

Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate Cox Hazard Analyses of Predictors for MACE

Figure 2 (a) The IMH group had a significantly higher MI volume than the IMH-absent group; (b) The MVO group had a significantly higher MI volume than the MVO-absent group; (c) HsTnT results during hospitalization of two groups of patients; (d) Relationship between IMH volume and MI volume. (***p<0.001; *p<0.05).

Figure 2 (a) The IMH group had a significantly higher MI volume than the IMH-absent group; (b) The MVO group had a significantly higher MI volume than the MVO-absent group; (c) HsTnT results during hospitalization of two groups of patients; (d) Relationship between IMH volume and MI volume. (***p<0.001; *p<0.05).

Figure 3 (a) LVEF of IMH-present group was lower than IMH-absent group; (b) It was no significant difference between MVO-present and MVO-absent group; (c) LVEF of MACE-present group was lower than MACE-absent group. (***p<0.001, **p<0.01).

Abbreviation: ns, not significant.
Figure 3 (a) LVEF of IMH-present group was lower than IMH-absent group; (b) It was no significant difference between MVO-present and MVO-absent group; (c) LVEF of MACE-present group was lower than MACE-absent group. (***p<0.001, **p<0.01).