120
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Gold nanoparticles and electroporation impose both separate and synergistic radiosensitizing effects in HT-29 tumor cells: an in vitro study

, , &
Pages 1431-1439 | Published online: 21 Feb 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1 The images of GNPs. (A) Transmission electron microscope image, (B) scanning electron microscope image.

Abbreviation: GNPs, gold nanoparticles.

Figure 1 The images of GNPs. (A) Transmission electron microscope image, (B) scanning electron microscope image.Abbreviation: GNPs, gold nanoparticles.

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures for six different treatment groups.

Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.

Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures for six different treatment groups.Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.

Figure 3 (A) Survival fraction of HT-29 cells incubated with GNPs at a concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05). (B) Survival fraction of CHO cells incubated with GNPs at concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05).

Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; GNPs, gold nanoparticles.

Figure 3 (A) Survival fraction of HT-29 cells incubated with GNPs at a concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05). (B) Survival fraction of CHO cells incubated with GNPs at concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05).Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; GNPs, gold nanoparticles.

Table 1 Values of α, β, LD50, DEF, and R2 values of HT-29 and CHO cells in different groups

Figure 4 (A) Radiation survival curves of cancerous HT-29 cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay. (B) Radiation survival curves of CHO cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay.

Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation; SF, survival fraction.

Figure 4 (A) Radiation survival curves of cancerous HT-29 cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay. (B) Radiation survival curves of CHO cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay.Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation; SF, survival fraction.

Figure 5 (A) The viability of HT-29 cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05. (B) The viability of CHO cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05.

Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.

Figure 5 (A) The viability of HT-29 cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05. (B) The viability of CHO cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05.Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.