Figures & data
Figure 1 The images of GNPs. (A) Transmission electron microscope image, (B) scanning electron microscope image.
Abbreviation: GNPs, gold nanoparticles.
![Figure 1 The images of GNPs. (A) Transmission electron microscope image, (B) scanning electron microscope image.Abbreviation: GNPs, gold nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/6e3eaa82-9d29-4ba5-b468-5709ff19977b/dijn_a_12193539_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures for six different treatment groups.
Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.
![Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the experimental procedures for six different treatment groups.Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.](/cms/asset/ab7afe45-e6af-41c4-a011-8806c378beec/dijn_a_12193539_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 (A) Survival fraction of HT-29 cells incubated with GNPs at a concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05). (B) Survival fraction of CHO cells incubated with GNPs at concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05).
Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; GNPs, gold nanoparticles.
![Figure 3 (A) Survival fraction of HT-29 cells incubated with GNPs at a concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05). (B) Survival fraction of CHO cells incubated with GNPs at concentration of 0.1 mM for 24, 48, and 72 h compared to nontreated group. None of the groups were statistically significant (P>0.05).Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; GNPs, gold nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/2681c66f-aa9b-48ee-b32f-0cfdbe6dc9ae/dijn_a_12193539_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1 Values of α, β, LD50, DEF, and R2 values of HT-29 and CHO cells in different groups
Figure 4 (A) Radiation survival curves of cancerous HT-29 cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay. (B) Radiation survival curves of CHO cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay.
Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation; SF, survival fraction.
![Figure 4 (A) Radiation survival curves of cancerous HT-29 cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay. (B) Radiation survival curves of CHO cells treated with six different protocols based on clonogenic assay.Abbreviations: IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation; SF, survival fraction.](/cms/asset/06052ac4-9534-43c5-9eee-51d0153589c1/dijn_a_12193539_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 (A) The viability of HT-29 cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05. (B) The viability of CHO cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05.
Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.
![Figure 5 (A) The viability of HT-29 cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05. (B) The viability of CHO cells treated with IR, GNPs+IR, GNPs (24 h)+IR, EP+IR, GNPs+EP+IR, and GNPs (24 h)+EP+IR based on MTT assay. *P<0.05.Abbreviations: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; IR, ionizing radiation; GNPs, gold nanoparticles; EP, electroporation.](/cms/asset/3f887770-9790-4b55-861e-274df795ae75/dijn_a_12193539_f0005_c.jpg)