Figures & data
Table 1 Formulation components of the lipophilic mixture of the final lipid nanospheres
Table 2 Formulation components of the surfactant mixture of the final lipid nanospheres
Table 5 Drug loading amount and entrapment efficiency (EE%) of the optimized lipid nanospheres (formulation composed of lipophilic mixture 2: MCT: 10 mg·mL−1, LCT: 10 mg·mL−1, monostearin 40: mg·mL−1, and surfactant mixture 1: E80: 20 mg·mL−1, Tween 80: 30 mg·mL−1, Lutrol F 68:10 mg·mL−1)
Table 3 Effect of different lipophilic mixtures on lipid nanospheres droplet size and entrapment efficiency (EE%); aqueous phase composed of surfactants 1 (E80: 20 mg·mL−1, Tween 80: 30 mg·mL−1, Lutrol F 68: 10 mg·mL−1), and 0.7 mg drugs added per mL of lipid nanospheres
Table 4 Effect of composition of surfactants on lipid nanospheres droplet size and entrapment efficiency (EE%); lipid mixtures composed of lipophilic mixture 2 (MCT: 10 mg·mL−1, LCT: 10 mg·mL−1, monostearin 40: mg·mL−1), 0.7 mg drugs added for per mL of lipid nanospheres
Figure 2 Mean particle size diameters of formulations after reconstitution with an optimized combination of cryoprotectants.
![Figure 2 Mean particle size diameters of formulations after reconstitution with an optimized combination of cryoprotectants.](/cms/asset/c000eb14-fe05-4f22-9d81-d4791c47ccfb/dijn_a_12184779_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 6 Effects of cryoprotectants on morphological characteristics of reconstituted lipid nanospheres from freeze-dried suspension (cryoprotectant concentration %)
Figure 3 A transmission electron microscopy image of 2% phosphotungstic acid-stained lipid nanospheres (pH adjusted to 7.4 with 0.1 mol/L−1 NaOH after preparation) (×40,000, bar = 200 nm).
![Figure 3 A transmission electron microscopy image of 2% phosphotungstic acid-stained lipid nanospheres (pH adjusted to 7.4 with 0.1 mol/L−1 NaOH after preparation) (×40,000, bar = 200 nm).](/cms/asset/dccb4835-4dfe-4a85-aeff-527ffb020595/dijn_a_12184779_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Differential scanning calorimetry scan of lyophilized lipid nanospheres (LNS) powder heating from 30°C to 120°C at a rate of 10°C·min−1. 1) The physical mixture material; 2) Placebo LNS; 3) Drug-loaded LNS (containing 0.7 mg·mL−1 of the model drug).
![Figure 4 Differential scanning calorimetry scan of lyophilized lipid nanospheres (LNS) powder heating from 30°C to 120°C at a rate of 10°C·min−1. 1) The physical mixture material; 2) Placebo LNS; 3) Drug-loaded LNS (containing 0.7 mg·mL−1 of the model drug).](/cms/asset/96ae0e46-2add-463d-b407-65022710465d/dijn_a_12184779_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Mean plasma log concentration–time profiles after iv administration of lipid nanospheres of chlorambucil (CHL-LNS) and free chlorambucil (CHL) at a dose of 10 mg·kg−1 in mice.
Note: Results are shown as mean ± SD.
![Figure 5 Mean plasma log concentration–time profiles after iv administration of lipid nanospheres of chlorambucil (CHL-LNS) and free chlorambucil (CHL) at a dose of 10 mg·kg−1 in mice.Note: Results are shown as mean ± SD.](/cms/asset/117a44b0-d54e-44d9-899c-9e712e5beeb8/dijn_a_12184779_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 7 Pharmacokinetic parameters after iv administration of chlorambucil (CHL) injection and lipid nanospheres (CHL-LNS) to mice