Figures & data
Figure 1 The flow chart of the whole analysis in this study.
Abbreviation: PGM, probabilistic graphical model.
![Figure 1 The flow chart of the whole analysis in this study.Abbreviation: PGM, probabilistic graphical model.](/cms/asset/ec046a33-f0d0-4887-8cf1-511f8a6e93af/dijn_a_12193912_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 Characterization of AgNPs. (A) Ultraviolet–visible spectra of AgNPs. (B) Transmission electron microscopy of AgNPs. (C) Histogram of the size of the particles.
Abbreviations: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; AU, arbitrary unit.
![Figure 2 Characterization of AgNPs. (A) Ultraviolet–visible spectra of AgNPs. (B) Transmission electron microscopy of AgNPs. (C) Histogram of the size of the particles.Abbreviations: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; AU, arbitrary unit.](/cms/asset/5e816676-6273-46e6-862e-a0882aa8b7c5/dijn_a_12193912_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Adhesion analysis in real time: presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated using Mann–Whitney U-test p<0.05 (*). MCF7 (A), HCC1954 (B), and HCC70 (C) cell lines.
Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.
![Figure 3 Adhesion analysis in real time: presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated using Mann–Whitney U-test p<0.05 (*). MCF7 (A), HCC1954 (B), and HCC70 (C) cell lines.Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/407c5cfc-7333-4783-ba66-2167f1bb1c0d/dijn_a_12193912_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Proliferation and viability: presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated by the Student’s t-test. P<0.01 (**).
Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.
![Figure 4 Proliferation and viability: presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated by the Student’s t-test. P<0.01 (**).Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/a51f968e-1048-4890-9f5e-565ad96d4099/dijn_a_12193912_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Determination of apoptosis: cells were stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FLl) and propidium iodide (FL2), and cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Total apoptosis percentage presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated by the Student’s t-test. P<0.01 (**). (B–D) Dot plots representative of each cell line.
Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.
![Figure 5 Determination of apoptosis: cells were stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FLl) and propidium iodide (FL2), and cell apoptosis was analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Total apoptosis percentage presented as mean and standard deviation; differences were calculated by the Student’s t-test. P<0.01 (**). (B–D) Dot plots representative of each cell line.Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/b0604f5b-b5a2-4ad6-948a-c6f1110bf346/dijn_a_12193912_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Gene expression heat map of 437 selected genes in each cell line.
Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.
![Figure 6 Gene expression heat map of 437 selected genes in each cell line.Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/5e15bdd1-aca4-43ca-b762-fd910132f6bd/dijn_a_12193912_f0006_c.jpg)
Table 1 PGM impact analysis
Figure 7 MEN of protein impact score. (A) Control cell lines and (B) cell lines treated with AgNPs.
Abbreviations: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; MEN, minimal essential network.
![Figure 7 MEN of protein impact score. (A) Control cell lines and (B) cell lines treated with AgNPs.Abbreviations: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; MEN, minimal essential network.](/cms/asset/e21156e6-20c9-4863-9e61-adb2d2568040/dijn_a_12193912_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 2 Pathways identified in modules
Table 3 PGM pathway analysis