Figures & data
Figure 1 Fourier transform infrared spectrum of (A) dendrimer-G2, (B) glutamine, and (C) dendrimer–glutamine.
![Figure 1 Fourier transform infrared spectrum of (A) dendrimer-G2, (B) glutamine, and (C) dendrimer–glutamine.](/cms/asset/de2046c3-91cf-4420-8ca1-9ba3c6a7b9aa/dijn_a_12193984_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 The 1H-NMR spectrum of (A) glutamine, (B) dendrimer-G2, (C) dendrimer–glutamine, and (D) 13C-NMR of dendrimer–glutamine.
Abbreviation: NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance.
![Figure 2 The 1H-NMR spectrum of (A) glutamine, (B) dendrimer-G2, (C) dendrimer–glutamine, and (D) 13C-NMR of dendrimer–glutamine.Abbreviation: NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance.](/cms/asset/a062d776-31b0-4b3f-a8a0-216b2c060b1e/dijn_a_12193984_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 5 (A) Size and (B) zeta potential. Red and black colors show the nanoconjugate and intact dendrimer, respectively.
![Figure 5 (A) Size and (B) zeta potential. Red and black colors show the nanoconjugate and intact dendrimer, respectively.](/cms/asset/d51957c1-922b-457c-b860-1bde34abbebd/dijn_a_12193984_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 7 XTT assay: (A) A549 and (B) HEK-293 cells were exposed to the nanoconjugate for 24 and 48 hours.
![Figure 7 XTT assay: (A) A549 and (B) HEK-293 cells were exposed to the nanoconjugate for 24 and 48 hours.](/cms/asset/d72c4861-4054-4998-a361-6711169d3616/dijn_a_12193984_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 Apoptosis/necrosis assay plots of A549 cells treated with 5.5 mg/mL of the nanoconjugate after 48 hours of incubation time.
![Figure 8 Apoptosis/necrosis assay plots of A549 cells treated with 5.5 mg/mL of the nanoconjugate after 48 hours of incubation time.](/cms/asset/d63aa9e5-8321-459d-81eb-7d0c91f0fac2/dijn_a_12193984_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 In vitro stability of 99mTc nanoconjugate complex in human serum at 37°C and PBS at room temperature.
Abbreviation: PBS, phosphate buffered saline.
![Figure 9 In vitro stability of 99mTc nanoconjugate complex in human serum at 37°C and PBS at room temperature.Abbreviation: PBS, phosphate buffered saline.](/cms/asset/df801e2c-589d-4957-a8e0-4ebb619f3923/dijn_a_12193984_f0009_c.jpg)
Table 1 Biodistribution profile of nanoconjugate at different times (dose per gram of tissue). Data expressed as percentage ID⁄g±SD (n=3)
Figure 10 Planar images with 99mTc nanoconjugate in mice acquired at different time intervals up until 1 hour after injection: (A) anterior, (B) posterior. The arrows indicate the tumor site.
![Figure 10 Planar images with 99mTc nanoconjugate in mice acquired at different time intervals up until 1 hour after injection: (A) anterior, (B) posterior. The arrows indicate the tumor site.](/cms/asset/eab994c0-ff15-4186-aae7-55f328a3e951/dijn_a_12193984_f0010_c.jpg)
Figure 11 Transverse, sagittal and coronal imaging of nude mice bearing A549 tumor 1 hour after injection of 3.7 MBq of radiolabeled nanoconjugate. Arrows indicate the tumor position.
![Figure 11 Transverse, sagittal and coronal imaging of nude mice bearing A549 tumor 1 hour after injection of 3.7 MBq of radiolabeled nanoconjugate. Arrows indicate the tumor position.](/cms/asset/865ad015-bf6c-41b9-a599-be620ec3d01b/dijn_a_12193984_f0011_c.jpg)
Figure 12 Tumor imaging of nude mice bearing A549 tumor 1 hour after injection of 3.7 MBq of 99mTc nanoconjugate (A) without and (B) with coadministration of 10 mg/mL of glutamine (glutamine blocking). The arrows indicate the tumor site.
![Figure 12 Tumor imaging of nude mice bearing A549 tumor 1 hour after injection of 3.7 MBq of 99mTc nanoconjugate (A) without and (B) with coadministration of 10 mg/mL of glutamine (glutamine blocking). The arrows indicate the tumor site.](/cms/asset/2a03cbd5-7ca1-4f6a-bf68-249f979981d2/dijn_a_12193984_f0012_c.jpg)