Figures & data
Figure 1 Release profile of PGZ from PGZ-NPs and Free-PGZ.
Abbreviations: PGZ, pioglitazone; NP, nanoparticles; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion.
![Figure 1 Release profile of PGZ from PGZ-NPs and Free-PGZ.Abbreviations: PGZ, pioglitazone; NP, nanoparticles; AIC, Akaike’s information criterion.](/cms/asset/1fb5512b-8cdb-4ed2-8fca-37d4e3416852/dijn_a_12194186_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 hCMEC/D3 cell viability measured by AB assay when exposed to 1.2–25 nM (0.5–10 µg/mL) PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs for 24 hours.
Notes: Data are shown as percentage of control (cell culture medium) which represents the maximum cell viability. Data are compared for each concentration of Rhod-NPs vs PGZ-NPs *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001 by Student’s t-test (n=3).
Abbreviations: hCMEC/D3, human cerebral microvascular endothelial cell; AB, alamar blue; PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles.
![Figure 2 hCMEC/D3 cell viability measured by AB assay when exposed to 1.2–25 nM (0.5–10 µg/mL) PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs for 24 hours.Notes: Data are shown as percentage of control (cell culture medium) which represents the maximum cell viability. Data are compared for each concentration of Rhod-NPs vs PGZ-NPs *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ****P<0.0001 by Student’s t-test (n=3).Abbreviations: hCMEC/D3, human cerebral microvascular endothelial cell; AB, alamar blue; PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/1a85faaa-0bbb-46ac-bbd5-0d8ec4a978e2/dijn_a_12194186_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 (A) FACS histograms of 10,000 hCMEC/D3 cells treated for 3 hours with Rhod-NPs or untreated cells. (B) Time-dependent interaction of Rhod-NPs with hCMEC/D3. Each value is the mean of the median fluorescence of 10,000 cells from three independent experiments. ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison (n=3). (C) Uptake of Rhod-NPs; Rhod-NPs-Free (not incorporated into the NPs) and Free-Rhod in comparison with untreated cells at 3 hours.
Notes: Each value is the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05 by one way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison (n=3).
Abbreviations: FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; hCMEC/D3, human brain microvascular endothelial cell line; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; NS, not significant.
![Figure 3 (A) FACS histograms of 10,000 hCMEC/D3 cells treated for 3 hours with Rhod-NPs or untreated cells. (B) Time-dependent interaction of Rhod-NPs with hCMEC/D3. Each value is the mean of the median fluorescence of 10,000 cells from three independent experiments. ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001 by one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison (n=3). (C) Uptake of Rhod-NPs; Rhod-NPs-Free (not incorporated into the NPs) and Free-Rhod in comparison with untreated cells at 3 hours.Notes: Each value is the mean of three independent experiments. *P<0.05 by one way ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple comparison (n=3).Abbreviations: FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; hCMEC/D3, human brain microvascular endothelial cell line; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; NS, not significant.](/cms/asset/fdfbd605-c8ec-4b53-abea-0ebf9215fb72/dijn_a_12194186_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of Rhod-NPs in hCMEC/D3. (A) hCMEC/D3 untreated (control); (B) hCMEC/D3 exposed to Free-Rhod and (C) hCMEC/D3 exposed to Rhod-NPs.
Notes: Cells were incubated for 3 hours with 1 µg/mL of NPs. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue).
Abbreviations: Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain microvascular endothelial cell line.
![Figure 4 Cellular uptake and intracellular distribution of Rhod-NPs in hCMEC/D3. (A) hCMEC/D3 untreated (control); (B) hCMEC/D3 exposed to Free-Rhod and (C) hCMEC/D3 exposed to Rhod-NPs.Notes: Cells were incubated for 3 hours with 1 µg/mL of NPs. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue).Abbreviations: Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain microvascular endothelial cell line.](/cms/asset/1416fa2f-81a2-46d4-b70b-4b61882956fc/dijn_a_12194186_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Localization of PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs in hCMEC/D3 by TEM.
Note: Cells exposed to 1 µg/mL for 6 hours.
Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain endothelial cell line; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.
![Figure 5 Localization of PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs in hCMEC/D3 by TEM.Note: Cells exposed to 1 µg/mL for 6 hours.Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain endothelial cell line; TEM, transmission electron microscopy.](/cms/asset/83951b89-d066-404f-9e81-e99648f64fd3/dijn_a_12194186_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6 (A) Images of PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs by TEM after 6 hours in the basolateral compartment. (B) Permeability of hCMEC/D3, following exposure to 1 µg/mL of NPs for 6 hours. TNFα+ IFNγ (10 ng/mL, for 24 hours) was used as a positive control, increasing endothelial permeability.
Notes: Each value is the mean of three independent experiments. ns=nonsignificant, *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (n=3).
Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain endothelial cell line; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TNFα, tumor necrosis factorα; IFNγ, interferon; Pe, permeability coefficient.
![Figure 6 (A) Images of PGZ-NPs and Rhod-NPs by TEM after 6 hours in the basolateral compartment. (B) Permeability of hCMEC/D3, following exposure to 1 µg/mL of NPs for 6 hours. TNFα+ IFNγ (10 ng/mL, for 24 hours) was used as a positive control, increasing endothelial permeability.Notes: Each value is the mean of three independent experiments. ns=nonsignificant, *P<0.05 by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test (n=3).Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; Rhod-NPs, Rhod-nanoparticles; hCMEC/D3, human brain endothelial cell line; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TNFα, tumor necrosis factorα; IFNγ, interferon; Pe, permeability coefficient.](/cms/asset/6cd2d606-734c-4e35-a0b7-c64f58f39024/dijn_a_12194186_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 In vivo evaluation of PGZ-NPs.
Notes: (A) Memory performance of treated animals in the two-object recognition test. APP/PS1 animals treated with vehicle showed cognitive impairment when compared with wild-type littermates. In contrast, Free-PGZ and PGZ-NPs treatment reduced the memory impairment in APP/PS1 mice. (B) Cortical Aβ burden is not significantly modified in treated APP/PS1 mice, in spite of the tendency to decreased deposition in NP-PGZ-treated animals. (C) Representative images of Aβ immunoreactivity in cortical sections of APP/PS1 mice chronically treated with Free-PGZ, PGZ-NPs or vehicle. Scale bar=200 µm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P<0.01 compared to WT animals. $P<0.05, $$P<0.01 compared to vehicle group.
Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; PGZ, pioglitazone; WT, wild-type; VEH, vehicle.
![Figure 7 In vivo evaluation of PGZ-NPs.Notes: (A) Memory performance of treated animals in the two-object recognition test. APP/PS1 animals treated with vehicle showed cognitive impairment when compared with wild-type littermates. In contrast, Free-PGZ and PGZ-NPs treatment reduced the memory impairment in APP/PS1 mice. (B) Cortical Aβ burden is not significantly modified in treated APP/PS1 mice, in spite of the tendency to decreased deposition in NP-PGZ-treated animals. (C) Representative images of Aβ immunoreactivity in cortical sections of APP/PS1 mice chronically treated with Free-PGZ, PGZ-NPs or vehicle. Scale bar=200 µm. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. **P<0.01 compared to WT animals. $P<0.05, $$P<0.01 compared to vehicle group.Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; PGZ, pioglitazone; WT, wild-type; VEH, vehicle.](/cms/asset/e10a99df-4e47-4dc1-b195-d9aaf88529c4/dijn_a_12194186_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure S1 Design of experiments. Response surfaces of PGZ-NPs at Tw 80 1.16%, with different concentrations of PGZ and PLGA-PEG: (A) Zav, (B) PI, (C) ZP and (D) EE.
Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; PGZ, pioglitazone; PLGA-PEG, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) polyethylene glycol; Zav, average particle size; PI, polydisper-sity index; ZP, zeta potential; EE, entrapment efficiency.
![Figure S1 Design of experiments. Response surfaces of PGZ-NPs at Tw 80 1.16%, with different concentrations of PGZ and PLGA-PEG: (A) Zav, (B) PI, (C) ZP and (D) EE.Abbreviations: PGZ-NPs, PGZ-loaded nanoparticles; PGZ, pioglitazone; PLGA-PEG, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) polyethylene glycol; Zav, average particle size; PI, polydisper-sity index; ZP, zeta potential; EE, entrapment efficiency.](/cms/asset/ab19f61e-9cac-49ed-b4ce-008137f5b193/dijn_a_12194186_sf0001_c.jpg)