Figures & data
Figure 1 (A) The φ 3.5× (20–22) mm stainless-steel screw and (B) n-CDHA/PAA screw.
Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.
![Figure 1 (A) The φ 3.5× (20–22) mm stainless-steel screw and (B) n-CDHA/PAA screw.Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.](/cms/asset/dbc44bb7-6368-482b-bf5e-8a2a61d55e9c/dijn_a_12194203_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 (A) The intercondylar fracture model of the femur; (B) control group was fixed with metal screw; and (C) experimental group was fixed with n-CDHA/PAA screw.
Note: Gray arrow indicates the metal screw cap and blue arrow indicates the n-CDHA/PAA screw cap.
Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.
![Figure 2 (A) The intercondylar fracture model of the femur; (B) control group was fixed with metal screw; and (C) experimental group was fixed with n-CDHA/PAA screw.Note: Gray arrow indicates the metal screw cap and blue arrow indicates the n-CDHA/PAA screw cap.Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.](/cms/asset/33bf34a2-8eb4-4e80-8e73-cdf260976ff4/dijn_a_12194203_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 1 The adjusted OAS system
Figure 3 The axial push-out test diagram.
Notes: (A) Push bin; (B) methyl methacrylate cement (including the harvested distal femoral condyle); and (C) clamp.
![Figure 3 The axial push-out test diagram.Notes: (A) Push bin; (B) methyl methacrylate cement (including the harvested distal femoral condyle); and (C) clamp.](/cms/asset/1bb7bec9-8aeb-4fce-afd0-6c845df38aa9/dijn_a_12194203_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 The specimen of harvested distal femoral condyles at 4 (A), 8 (B), and 12 (C) weeks after surgery in the control group; the specimen of harvested distal femoral condyles at 4 (D), 8 (E), and 12 (F) weeks after surgery in the experimental group.
![Figure 4 The specimen of harvested distal femoral condyles at 4 (A), 8 (B), and 12 (C) weeks after surgery in the control group; the specimen of harvested distal femoral condyles at 4 (D), 8 (E), and 12 (F) weeks after surgery in the experimental group.](/cms/asset/f56ac53c-e234-43cc-b237-7af8cf4fd613/dijn_a_12194203_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 (A) The X-ray results at 4 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view). (B) The X-ray results at 8 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view). (C) The X-ray results at 12 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view).
![Figure 5 (A) The X-ray results at 4 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view). (B) The X-ray results at 8 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view). (C) The X-ray results at 12 weeks after surgery in the control group (a, anteroposterior view; b, lateral view) and in the experimental group (c, anteroposterior view; d, lateral view).](/cms/asset/1fb96e2d-8589-4e6c-8e36-30623b79a058/dijn_a_12194203_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6 The Lane-Sandhu scores in the control and experimental groups.
Note: *P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).
![Figure 6 The Lane-Sandhu scores in the control and experimental groups.Note: *P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).](/cms/asset/a72d2b9d-34ce-4e2e-8cc8-19a03fa0aebf/dijn_a_12194203_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 The range of motion of knee joints in the control and experimental groups.
Note: *P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).
![Figure 7 The range of motion of knee joints in the control and experimental groups.Note: *P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).](/cms/asset/8ddb0898-ec73-405a-b315-9be74fda41ea/dijn_a_12194203_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 2 The results of adjusted OAS for femoral intercondylar fracture
Figure 8 The results of push-out strength in the control and experimental groups.
Note: *P<0.01, #P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).
![Figure 8 The results of push-out strength in the control and experimental groups.Note: *P<0.01, #P>0.05, compared with control group (n=5).](/cms/asset/29ee93ba-c09a-400b-93cb-e57e7f3000cb/dijn_a_12194203_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 The weight loss of n-CDHA/PAA screw in vivo (n=5).
Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.
![Figure 9 The weight loss of n-CDHA/PAA screw in vivo (n=5).Abbreviation: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid.](/cms/asset/e5b01f61-38cc-4d6a-8894-0cc13df99e72/dijn_a_12194203_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10 The result of XRD of n-CDHA/PAA screw.
Notes: (A) The outer surface of n-CDHA/PAA before implantation; (B) The internal cross-section of n-CDHA/PAA after implantation; (C) The outer surface of n-CDHA/PAA after implantation.
Abbreviations: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid; XRD, X-ray diffraction.
![Figure 10 The result of XRD of n-CDHA/PAA screw.Notes: (A) The outer surface of n-CDHA/PAA before implantation; (B) The internal cross-section of n-CDHA/PAA after implantation; (C) The outer surface of n-CDHA/PAA after implantation.Abbreviations: n-CDHA/PAA, nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid; XRD, X-ray diffraction.](/cms/asset/91edbaa8-7626-427b-86c7-436e7bc45ec1/dijn_a_12194203_f0010_b.jpg)