206
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Development of a Solid Supersaturable Micelle of Revaprazan for Improved Dissolution and Oral Bioavailability Using Box-Behnken Design

, ORCID Icon, , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1245-1259 | Published online: 17 Feb 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1 Solubility of RVP in various surfactant solutions (1% [w/w]) (A) and CMC determination via the solubilization method (B).

Abbreviations: LG, Lauroglycol 90; LF, Labrafil M 1944 CS; BL4, Brij L4; LS, Labrasol; RH60, Kolliphor RH60; RH40, Kolliphor RH40; G44, Gelucire 44/14; EL, Kolliphor EL; T80, Tween 80; T20, Tween 20.
Figure 1 Solubility of RVP in various surfactant solutions (1% [w/w]) (A) and CMC determination via the solubilization method (B).

Figure 2 Dissolution profiles of micelle with or without various supersaturating agents.

Note: *p <0.05 versus Micelle only.
Abbreviations: P407, Poloxamer 407; K90, Kollidon K90; P188, Poloxamer 188; K30, Kollidon K30.
Figure 2 Dissolution profiles of micelle with or without various supersaturating agents.

Figure 3 Plots of the CI against the ratio of solid carrier to SuM to evaluate flow property changes in SuM formulations with silica-based adsorbents (A) and cellulose-based diluents (B).

Note: Arrows indicate the critical solidifying ratio.
Abbreviations: FLO, Florite PS-10; VP105, Vivapur 105; VP12, Vivapur 12; L-HPC, low-substituted hydroxypropyl cellulose B1.
Figure 3 Plots of the CI against the ratio of solid carrier to SuM to evaluate flow property changes in SuM formulations with silica-based adsorbents (A) and cellulose-based diluents (B).

Table 1 Independent and Response Variables Used in Box-Behnken Design

Table 2 Combinations of Independent Variable and Experimental Responses from Runs

Table 3 Summary of the Results of Statistical Analysis and Model Equations for the Measured Responses

Table 4 Analysis of Variance of the Experimental Responses for Quadratic Model

Figure 4 Effects of independent factors on response variables: three-dimensional response surface plots of Y1 (A), Y2 (B), and Y3 (C).

Figure 4 Effects of independent factors on response variables: three-dimensional response surface plots of Y1 (A), Y2 (B), and Y3 (C).

Table 5 Predicted Values and Experimental Values for the Optimized RVP-Loaded SSuM Formulation

Figure 5 Solid-state properties of powders. (A) Scanning electron microscopy images. (B) Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms. (C) Powder X-ray diffractometry patterns.

Note: Scale bar = 10 μm.
Abbreviations: RVP, revaprazan; FLO, Florite PS-10; VP105, Vivapur 105; PM, physical mixture of RVP and solid carriers; SSuM, solid supersaturable micelle.
Figure 5 Solid-state properties of powders. (A) Scanning electron microscopy images. (B) Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms. (C) Powder X-ray diffractometry patterns.

Figure 6 Dissolution profiles of raw RVP, Revaprazan® (powder), solid micelle, and the optimized SSuM in distilled water.

Note: Values are the mean ± standard error (n = 3).
Abbreviations: RVP; revaprazan; SSuM, solid supersaturable micelle.
Figure 6 Dissolution profiles of raw RVP, Revaprazan® (powder), solid micelle, and the optimized SSuM in distilled water.

Figure 7 Plasma RVP concentration profiles after oral administrations of different formulations to Sprague-Dawley rats at an equivalent dose of 20 mg/kg of RVP.

Note: Values are the mean ± standard deviation (n = 6–8).
Abbreviations: RVP, revaprazan; SSuM, solid supersaturable micelle.
Figure 7 Plasma RVP concentration profiles after oral administrations of different formulations to Sprague-Dawley rats at an equivalent dose of 20 mg/kg of RVP.

Table 6 PK Parameters of RVP Formulations in Rats