Figures & data
Table 1 Effects of wollastonite nanofiber (WNF) amounts on properties of WNF-doped calcium phosphate cement (CPC) (powder-to-liquid ratio, 2.5)
Table 2 Effects of powder-to-liquid (P/L) ratio on properties of wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% WNFs
Figure 1 Scanning electron microscope images of wollastonite nanofibers with different magnifications: (A) ×30000 and (B) ×60000.
![Figure 1 Scanning electron microscope images of wollastonite nanofibers with different magnifications: (A) ×30000 and (B) ×60000.](/cms/asset/d0329ee7-7ee1-4317-b83a-13796459b298/dijn_a_32061_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 X-ray diffraction (A) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (B) patterns of wollastonite nanofibers (WNFs), WNF-doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, and calcium phosphate cement (CPC).
Abbreviation: HA, hydroxyapatite.
![Figure 2 X-ray diffraction (A) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (B) patterns of wollastonite nanofibers (WNFs), WNF-doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, and calcium phosphate cement (CPC).Abbreviation: HA, hydroxyapatite.](/cms/asset/7f15b25e-bf7c-4a0b-8f4e-9fd5678b01e3/dijn_a_32061_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Scanning electron microscope images of surface morphology/microstructure of (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement.
![Figure 3 Scanning electron microscope images of surface morphology/microstructure of (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement.](/cms/asset/0eecfba7-c08b-4e92-a353-9faba42e4b97/dijn_a_32061_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 4 Weight loss ratio of wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) and calcium phosphate cement (CPC) soaking in tris hydrochloride solution over time.
![Figure 4 Weight loss ratio of wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) and calcium phosphate cement (CPC) soaking in tris hydrochloride solution over time.](/cms/asset/ed9cf897-63cd-41a4-a07e-a770340adafd/dijn_a_32061_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Changes in calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), and phosphorus (P) ion concentrations in the tris hydrochloride solution for wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers over time.
![Figure 5 Changes in calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), and phosphorus (P) ion concentrations in the tris hydrochloride solution for wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers over time.](/cms/asset/dccdbdf0-fb37-4f07-9638-7b768f214a79/dijn_a_32061_f0005_c.jpg)
Table 3 Effects of soaking time on porosity of calcium phosphate cement (CPC) and wollastonite nanofiber–doped CPC (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers (powder-to-liquid ratio, 2.5)
Figure 6 Scanning electron microscope images of surface morphology of (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement immersed in tris hydrochloride solution for 5 weeks.
![Figure 6 Scanning electron microscope images of surface morphology of (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement immersed in tris hydrochloride solution for 5 weeks.](/cms/asset/fd478bee-1e64-4465-a344-9178634376c9/dijn_a_32061_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7 Methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium bromide assay of attachment ratio of MG-63 cells on wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and a tissue culture plate as a control after being cultured for 4 hours.
Abbreviation: OD, optical density.
![Figure 7 Methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium bromide assay of attachment ratio of MG-63 cells on wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and a tissue culture plate as a control after being cultured for 4 hours.Abbreviation: OD, optical density.](/cms/asset/457612ef-53ae-447b-817b-b4fb308c4c49/dijn_a_32061_f0007_b.jpg)
Figure 8 Methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium bromide assay of proliferation of MG-63 cells on wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and a tissue culture plate as a control at different times.
Abbreviation: OD, optical density.
![Figure 8 Methyl-thiazolyl-tetrazolium bromide assay of proliferation of MG-63 cells on wollastonite nanofiber (WNF)–doped calcium phosphate cement (wnf-CPC) with 10 wt% WNFs, calcium phosphate cement (CPC), and a tissue culture plate as a control at different times.Abbreviation: OD, optical density.](/cms/asset/2193ba79-33b1-4b33-9405-b10afcb16163/dijn_a_32061_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 Morphology of cells cultured with samples for 3 days: (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement.
Notes: M represents materials; C represents cells; arrow indicates interface between materials and cells.
![Figure 9 Morphology of cells cultured with samples for 3 days: (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and (B) calcium phosphate cement.Notes: M represents materials; C represents cells; arrow indicates interface between materials and cells.](/cms/asset/7cfcc89e-44ea-4c40-b197-4d32e069d516/dijn_a_32061_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10 Scanning electron microscope images of MG-63 cells spread on (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and on (B) calcium phosphate cement samples for 3 days.
Note: Arrow indicates cells.
![Figure 10 Scanning electron microscope images of MG-63 cells spread on (A) wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofibers and on (B) calcium phosphate cement samples for 3 days.Note: Arrow indicates cells.](/cms/asset/e5b90378-ff2b-409e-8d58-eb1f5aed9e51/dijn_a_32061_f0010_c.jpg)
Table 4 Changes in calcium (Ca), silicon (Si), and phosphorus (P) concentrations and pH values in culture medium with time
Figure 11 Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections (magnification, ×20) of wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofiber samples implanted into bone defects of rabbit femora for (A) 3, (B) 6, and (C) 12 weeks, and of (D) calcium phosphate cement implanted for 12 weeks.
Notes: B represents new bone tissues; M represents implanted materials.
![Figure 11 Hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections (magnification, ×20) of wollastonite nanofiber–doped calcium phosphate cement with 10 wt% wollastonite nanofiber samples implanted into bone defects of rabbit femora for (A) 3, (B) 6, and (C) 12 weeks, and of (D) calcium phosphate cement implanted for 12 weeks.Notes: B represents new bone tissues; M represents implanted materials.](/cms/asset/b0d8096b-f80d-404b-81b8-ad3b750801ed/dijn_a_32061_f0011_c.jpg)