Figures & data
Table 1 Surface Elemental Composition of Plasma Nanocoatings as Determined by XPS
Figure 2 (A) Representative AFM images of nanocoatings. (B) The quantitative analysis of surface roughness of nanocoatings.
![Figure 2 (A) Representative AFM images of nanocoatings. (B) The quantitative analysis of surface roughness of nanocoatings.](/cms/asset/62e87173-b41c-442c-91a6-75762df22afb/dijn_a_12184732_f0002_c.jpg)
Table 2 Membrane Thickness and Water Contact Angle
Figure 3 The average protein adsorption concentration of nanocoatings. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group.
![Figure 3 The average protein adsorption concentration of nanocoatings. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group.](/cms/asset/ae091cc9-2aed-424d-b558-f51557189192/dijn_a_12184732_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 (A) Proliferation of S. aureus after 24 h. (B) Proliferation of S. mutans after 12 and 24 h. (C) S. aureus biofilm formation after 24 h. (D) S. mutans biofilm formation after 12 and 24 h. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001.
![Figure 4 (A) Proliferation of S. aureus after 24 h. (B) Proliferation of S. mutans after 12 and 24 h. (C) S. aureus biofilm formation after 24 h. (D) S. mutans biofilm formation after 12 and 24 h. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001.](/cms/asset/e2a0e78b-4955-423c-a058-35869319ec86/dijn_a_12184732_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of S. mutans after 12 h of control (A), A1 (B), A2 (C), B1 (D), B2 (E).
![Figure 5 Representative scanning electron micrographs of S. mutans after 12 h of control (A), A1 (B), A2 (C), B1 (D), B2 (E).](/cms/asset/e76e4fab-fb1d-4fe9-84a1-cf786db2dc0f/dijn_a_12184732_f0005_b.jpg)
Figure 6 Representative scanning electron micrographs of S. mutans after 24 h control (A), A1 (B), A2 (C), B1 (D), B2 (E).
![Figure 6 Representative scanning electron micrographs of S. mutans after 24 h control (A), A1 (B), A2 (C), B1 (D), B2 (E).](/cms/asset/7c160ffc-d93a-4f3c-baa6-5bbcf8c6b859/dijn_a_12184732_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7 Proliferation of (A) HGFs and (B) HaCaTs after 1, 3, 5 days. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group; ##p < 0.01.
![Figure 7 Proliferation of (A) HGFs and (B) HaCaTs after 1, 3, 5 days. Data are means ± SD; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared to the control group; ##p < 0.01.](/cms/asset/ce7f3e59-d33d-454d-8fd2-4b05abe6e2be/dijn_a_12184732_f0007_c.jpg)