Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/8d497e91-3288-42e1-a7f2-0e059173613e/dijn_a_12184783_uf0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 The Emission Wavelength and Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Against S. Aureus of CDs Prepared from Different Raw Materials
Figure 1 (A) The UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectrum for QCS-CA-CDs. Insets: QCS-CA-CDs solutions in daylight (left) and 365 nm UV lamp (right). (B) The UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectrum of QCS-EDA-CDs. Insets: QCS-EDA-CDs solutions in daylight (left) and 365 nm UV lamp (right). (C) FTIR spectra of QCS-CDs, QCS-CA-CDs and QCS-EDA-CDs. (D) zeta potential curves obtained for water suspensions of QCS-CA-CDs and QCS-EDA-CDs.
![Figure 1 (A) The UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectrum for QCS-CA-CDs. Insets: QCS-CA-CDs solutions in daylight (left) and 365 nm UV lamp (right). (B) The UV-Vis absorption and fluorescence spectrum of QCS-EDA-CDs. Insets: QCS-EDA-CDs solutions in daylight (left) and 365 nm UV lamp (right). (C) FTIR spectra of QCS-CDs, QCS-CA-CDs and QCS-EDA-CDs. (D) zeta potential curves obtained for water suspensions of QCS-CA-CDs and QCS-EDA-CDs.](/cms/asset/af5197c2-5352-4ef0-adb9-3de96c1ae599/dijn_a_12184783_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 2 (A) Emission spectra of QCS-EDA-CDs with different excitation wavelengths. (B) TEM image of QCS-EDA-CDs. (C). Size distribution histogram of QCS-EDA-CDs. High-resolution XPS spectra (D) C1s, (E) O1s, and (F) N1s of QCS-EDA-CDs.
![Figure 2 (A) Emission spectra of QCS-EDA-CDs with different excitation wavelengths. (B) TEM image of QCS-EDA-CDs. (C). Size distribution histogram of QCS-EDA-CDs. High-resolution XPS spectra (D) C1s, (E) O1s, and (F) N1s of QCS-EDA-CDs.](/cms/asset/c7b9ef7b-070e-4d1c-b716-b9bf6ecbedd8/dijn_a_12184783_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2 Antibacterial Activities of QCS-CDs Were Compared with Various Chemically Prepared NPs and CDs
Figure 3 Inhibition effect of different QCS-EDA-CDs concentrations on S. aureus growth as a function of incubation time.
![Figure 3 Inhibition effect of different QCS-EDA-CDs concentrations on S. aureus growth as a function of incubation time.](/cms/asset/451abdc0-2450-4f5f-95a8-fa90ad8598d3/dijn_a_12184783_f0004_c.jpg)
Table 3 Anti-Bacterial Biofilm Activities of Different Nanoparticles
Figure 4 Fluorescence microscopy images for S. aureus biofilms stained by (A-C) 250 μg/mL and (D-F) 500 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs for 2.5 h.
![Figure 4 Fluorescence microscopy images for S. aureus biofilms stained by (A-C) 250 μg/mL and (D-F) 500 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs for 2.5 h.](/cms/asset/acc06f55-f509-452d-b6bd-635743dd4fa6/dijn_a_12184783_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Confocal fluorescence image for S. aureus biofilm dyed in PI/DAPI exhibiting the existence of live bacteria (blue) and dead bacteria (red) upon treatment using (A-C) PBS, (D-F) 250 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs and (G-I) 500 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs for 2.5 h.
![Figure 5 Confocal fluorescence image for S. aureus biofilm dyed in PI/DAPI exhibiting the existence of live bacteria (blue) and dead bacteria (red) upon treatment using (A-C) PBS, (D-F) 250 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs and (G-I) 500 μg/mL QCS-EDA-CDs for 2.5 h.](/cms/asset/661049c5-df88-4763-87cc-5c31883cac5c/dijn_a_12184783_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 6 SEM images of S. aureus biofilm incubated for 4 h upon treatment of (A) PBS and (B) QCS-EDA-CDs (800 μg/mL), respectively.
![Figure 6 SEM images of S. aureus biofilm incubated for 4 h upon treatment of (A) PBS and (B) QCS-EDA-CDs (800 μg/mL), respectively.](/cms/asset/bfc47401-094d-4528-8c17-3ed1bf01939b/dijn_a_12184783_f0007_b.jpg)
Scheme 2 Schematic diagram exhibiting QCS-EDA-CDs’ attack against S. aureus. QCS-EDA-CDs attach to the cell membrane by charge interactions, thus piercing cell membrane and damaging the DNA and protein of bacterial cells.
![Scheme 2 Schematic diagram exhibiting QCS-EDA-CDs’ attack against S. aureus. QCS-EDA-CDs attach to the cell membrane by charge interactions, thus piercing cell membrane and damaging the DNA and protein of bacterial cells.](/cms/asset/25f4af95-9f06-4acc-b8f7-febccaae5e84/dijn_a_12184783_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 7 (A) Circular dichroism spectra for DNA with and without QCS-EDA-CDs treatment. (B) Circular dichroism spectra for S. aureus protein with and without QCS-EDA-CDs.
![Figure 7 (A) Circular dichroism spectra for DNA with and without QCS-EDA-CDs treatment. (B) Circular dichroism spectra for S. aureus protein with and without QCS-EDA-CDs.](/cms/asset/59b5aa78-0dc5-4f7f-a450-ce4002de46c1/dijn_a_12184783_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 8 (A) Cell viability in LO2 cells at different QCS-EDA-CDs concentrations with DMSO as the positive control. (B) Hemolysis rate of QCS-EDA-CDs at different concentrations. Data are mean (SD ± n = 3).
![Figure 8 (A) Cell viability in LO2 cells at different QCS-EDA-CDs concentrations with DMSO as the positive control. (B) Hemolysis rate of QCS-EDA-CDs at different concentrations. Data are mean (SD ± n = 3).](/cms/asset/c95c420c-b093-427a-aece-4c8df8b0236f/dijn_a_12184783_f0010_c.jpg)