Figures & data
Figure 1 (A) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different Ag+ concentrations; (B) Silver ion conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different Ag+ concentrations; (C) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different pH; (D) Silver ion conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different pH; (E) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different temperatures; (F) Ag conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different temperatures.
![Figure 1 (A) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different Ag+ concentrations; (B) Silver ion conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different Ag+ concentrations; (C) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different pH; (D) Silver ion conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different pH; (E) UV–Vis spectra of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different temperatures; (F) Ag conversion rate of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ at different temperatures.](/cms/asset/16839056-d184-4b9f-8d10-1707eda086ff/dijn_a_12184817_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 (A) SEM image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (B) TEM image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (C) FTIR image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (D) XRD pattern of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (E) XPS pattern of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ.
![Figure 2 (A) SEM image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (B) TEM image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (C) FTIR image of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (D) XRD pattern of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ; (E) XPS pattern of AgNPs synthesized by LLJ.](/cms/asset/6d084181-b5e9-4022-b4f5-48403a81b93e/dijn_a_12184817_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Comparison of free radical DPPH clearance rate between AgNPs, LLJ, and BHT.
![Figure 3 Comparison of free radical DPPH clearance rate between AgNPs, LLJ, and BHT.](/cms/asset/7aca7e81-2ea0-48ce-a35f-a35a5d339b86/dijn_a_12184817_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Amount of viable bacteria of culture medium. (A) E. coli; (B) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL LLJ; (C) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL AgNPs; (D) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL tetracycline; (E) Salmonella; (F) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL LLJ; (G) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL AgNPs; (H) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL tetracycline.
![Figure 4 Amount of viable bacteria of culture medium. (A) E. coli; (B) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL LLJ; (C) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL AgNPs; (D) E. coli treated with 0.1 mg/mL tetracycline; (E) Salmonella; (F) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL LLJ; (G) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL AgNPs; (H) Salmonella treated with 0.1 mg/mL tetracycline.](/cms/asset/7d4af5f0-411a-40c6-b4c5-886111b1bc0e/dijn_a_12184817_f0004_b.jpg)
Figure 5 The inhibition rate curves of different samples to bacteria. (A). E. coli; (B). Salmonella.
![Figure 5 The inhibition rate curves of different samples to bacteria. (A). E. coli; (B). Salmonella.](/cms/asset/790b54b5-76e0-4dfd-a11d-ff78c2040780/dijn_a_12184817_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 SEM images of bacterial morphology. (A) E. coli; (B) E. coli with LLJ; (C) E. coli with AgNPs; (D) E. coli with tetracycline; (E) Salmonella; (F) Salmonella with LLJ; (G) Salmonella with AgNPs; (H) Salmonella with tetracycline.
![Figure 6 SEM images of bacterial morphology. (A) E. coli; (B) E. coli with LLJ; (C) E. coli with AgNPs; (D) E. coli with tetracycline; (E) Salmonella; (F) Salmonella with LLJ; (G) Salmonella with AgNPs; (H) Salmonella with tetracycline.](/cms/asset/4569b3dc-81a4-4c11-97f8-b20a8cdaa5e2/dijn_a_12184817_f0006_c.jpg)