Figures & data
Figure 1 FTIR patterns of (A) ICG, (B) ACC, (C) ICG@, (D) PSC, (E) PSC/ICG@ and (F) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles.
![Figure 1 FTIR patterns of (A) ICG, (B) ACC, (C) ICG@, (D) PSC, (E) PSC/ICG@ and (F) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/93ada587-6e76-4e4f-bba7-e738a96b869a/dijn_a_12154877_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Physicochemical Properties of Drug-Free and Drug-Loaded Nanoparticles
Figure 3 (A) Temperature changes of different formulations with the same ICG concentration (10 μg/mL) under NIR irradiation for 5 min. The temperature was determined by a thermocouple. (B) Infrared thermal images of water, ICG, PSC/ICG@ and PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles under NIR irradiation for 5 min. (C) changes in absorption values of free ICG, PSC/ICG@ and PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in distilled water at 784 nm (n = 3).
![Figure 3 (A) Temperature changes of different formulations with the same ICG concentration (10 μg/mL) under NIR irradiation for 5 min. The temperature was determined by a thermocouple. (B) Infrared thermal images of water, ICG, PSC/ICG@ and PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles under NIR irradiation for 5 min. (C) changes in absorption values of free ICG, PSC/ICG@ and PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in distilled water at 784 nm (n = 3).](/cms/asset/6188b385-0cd1-4121-a243-a15716f48e82/dijn_a_12154877_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 DOX release profiles of PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in PBS (pH 7.4, or pH 5.5) in the presence or absence of 20 mM GSH at 37°C.
![Figure 4 DOX release profiles of PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in PBS (pH 7.4, or pH 5.5) in the presence or absence of 20 mM GSH at 37°C.](/cms/asset/4c3511db-cd75-46c3-8781-2ae25eae1f34/dijn_a_12154877_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 CLSM images of 4T1 cells treated with (A) DOX·HCl, (B) DOX·HCl+ICG (NIR), (C) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles (no NIR), and (D) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles (NIR).
![Figure 5 CLSM images of 4T1 cells treated with (A) DOX·HCl, (B) DOX·HCl+ICG (NIR), (C) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles (no NIR), and (D) PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles (NIR).](/cms/asset/eff68525-c0ed-4d25-852d-8135c23ecbed/dijn_a_12154877_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 In vitro cytotoxicity in 4T1 cells treated with DOX·HCl, ICG, DOX·HCl+ICG, PSC/ICG@ nanoparticles, PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 808 nm NIR irradiation. (n=4).
![Figure 6 In vitro cytotoxicity in 4T1 cells treated with DOX·HCl, ICG, DOX·HCl+ICG, PSC/ICG@ nanoparticles, PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticles in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 808 nm NIR irradiation. (n=4).](/cms/asset/b401dc55-dae6-475e-9945-b4f9afb34344/dijn_a_12154877_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 (A) Scheme of the timeline for in vivo treatment and laser irradiation in 4T1-bearing orthotopic mice. (B) Tumor growth curves of mice after the treatment. (C) The images of 4T1-bearing mice with the injection of 5% glucose, DOX·HCl+ICG, PSC/ICG@ or PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticle after laser irradiation under the 808 nm laser irradiation (2.0 W/cm2) at 24 h post-injection. (D) Body weight change within 14 days. *P < 0.05, PSC/ICG@+DOX (NIR) group vs PSC/ICG@+DOX (no NIR) group; **P < 0.01 PSC/ICG@+DOX (NIR) group vs other groups; #P < 0.05, PSC/ICG@+DOX group (no NIR) vs DOX·HCl group. (n=5).
![Figure 7 (A) Scheme of the timeline for in vivo treatment and laser irradiation in 4T1-bearing orthotopic mice. (B) Tumor growth curves of mice after the treatment. (C) The images of 4T1-bearing mice with the injection of 5% glucose, DOX·HCl+ICG, PSC/ICG@ or PSC/ICG@+DOX nanoparticle after laser irradiation under the 808 nm laser irradiation (2.0 W/cm2) at 24 h post-injection. (D) Body weight change within 14 days. *P < 0.05, PSC/ICG@+DOX (NIR) group vs PSC/ICG@+DOX (no NIR) group; **P < 0.01 PSC/ICG@+DOX (NIR) group vs other groups; #P < 0.05, PSC/ICG@+DOX group (no NIR) vs DOX·HCl group. (n=5).](/cms/asset/bf2ce23f-e1a4-48e6-9f5c-7d3e5f4e4ae3/dijn_a_12154877_f0007_c.jpg)