88
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Comparison of three magnetic nanoparticle tracers for sentinel lymph node biopsy in an in vivo porcine model

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1235-1243 | Published online: 11 Feb 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1 Particle size distribution of the three magnetic tracers by dynamic light scattering.

Note: The particle size (logarithmic scale) is shown against the intensity.

Figure 1 Particle size distribution of the three magnetic tracers by dynamic light scattering.Note: The particle size (logarithmic scale) is shown against the intensity.

Figure 2 Relationship between the time after injection of the magnetic tracer and successful identification of transcutaneous hotspot.

Figure 2 Relationship between the time after injection of the magnetic tracer and successful identification of transcutaneous hotspot.

Figure 3 Boxplots of the relationship between the magnetic tracer and: (A) the number of excised sentinel lymph nodes during surgery; (B) the ex vivo magnetometer counts of the excised sentinel lymph nodes; (C) the iron content measured of the excised sentinel lymph nodes by vibrating sample magnetometry.

Notes: The circle symbols represent outliers; the diamond symbols represent the mean value.

Figure 3 Boxplots of the relationship between the magnetic tracer and: (A) the number of excised sentinel lymph nodes during surgery; (B) the ex vivo magnetometer counts of the excised sentinel lymph nodes; (C) the iron content measured of the excised sentinel lymph nodes by vibrating sample magnetometry.Notes: The circle symbols represent outliers; the diamond symbols represent the mean value.

Figure 4 Correlation between the iron content as determined by vibrating sample magnetometry and the ex vivo magnetometer counts for the different magnetic tracers.

Figure 4 Correlation between the iron content as determined by vibrating sample magnetometry and the ex vivo magnetometer counts for the different magnetic tracers.

Figure 5 Iron distribution within nodes on histopathology using Perl’s Prussian blue staining for iron and haematoxyline & eosine.

Notes: Magnification 2×, with inserts at 20× magnification. (A) Node containing the 111-nm tracer; (B) node containing the 59 nm tracer; (C) node containing the 32 nm tracer.

Figure 5 Iron distribution within nodes on histopathology using Perl’s Prussian blue staining for iron and haematoxyline & eosine.Notes: Magnification 2×, with inserts at 20× magnification. (A) Node containing the 111-nm tracer; (B) node containing the 59 nm tracer; (C) node containing the 32 nm tracer.

Figure 6 Number of excised sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) per grade of iron distribution, for the three different magnetic tracers.

Note: Grade 0 = none, Grade 1 = minimal, Grade 2 = mild, Grade 3 = moderate, and Grade 4 = marked.

Figure 6 Number of excised sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) per grade of iron distribution, for the three different magnetic tracers.Note: Grade 0 = none, Grade 1 = minimal, Grade 2 = mild, Grade 3 = moderate, and Grade 4 = marked.