Figures & data
Figure 1 Particle size distribution of the three magnetic tracers by dynamic light scattering.
Note: The particle size (logarithmic scale) is shown against the intensity.
![Figure 1 Particle size distribution of the three magnetic tracers by dynamic light scattering.Note: The particle size (logarithmic scale) is shown against the intensity.](/cms/asset/dfafbf71-fb9e-427e-9fdd-fb64e7f6c6dd/dijn_a_76962_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Relationship between the time after injection of the magnetic tracer and successful identification of transcutaneous hotspot.
![Figure 2 Relationship between the time after injection of the magnetic tracer and successful identification of transcutaneous hotspot.](/cms/asset/5a3b50d2-ec6d-44fa-b3e9-4c702c228d75/dijn_a_76962_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Boxplots of the relationship between the magnetic tracer and: (A) the number of excised sentinel lymph nodes during surgery; (B) the ex vivo magnetometer counts of the excised sentinel lymph nodes; (C) the iron content measured of the excised sentinel lymph nodes by vibrating sample magnetometry.
Notes: The circle symbols represent outliers; the diamond symbols represent the mean value.
![Figure 3 Boxplots of the relationship between the magnetic tracer and: (A) the number of excised sentinel lymph nodes during surgery; (B) the ex vivo magnetometer counts of the excised sentinel lymph nodes; (C) the iron content measured of the excised sentinel lymph nodes by vibrating sample magnetometry.Notes: The circle symbols represent outliers; the diamond symbols represent the mean value.](/cms/asset/2e528371-2bb0-4662-96b2-0492a5ce4e39/dijn_a_76962_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Correlation between the iron content as determined by vibrating sample magnetometry and the ex vivo magnetometer counts for the different magnetic tracers.
![Figure 4 Correlation between the iron content as determined by vibrating sample magnetometry and the ex vivo magnetometer counts for the different magnetic tracers.](/cms/asset/64b92917-c741-4153-aa28-e5b754efe049/dijn_a_76962_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Iron distribution within nodes on histopathology using Perl’s Prussian blue staining for iron and haematoxyline & eosine.
Notes: Magnification 2×, with inserts at 20× magnification. (A) Node containing the 111-nm tracer; (B) node containing the 59 nm tracer; (C) node containing the 32 nm tracer.
![Figure 5 Iron distribution within nodes on histopathology using Perl’s Prussian blue staining for iron and haematoxyline & eosine.Notes: Magnification 2×, with inserts at 20× magnification. (A) Node containing the 111-nm tracer; (B) node containing the 59 nm tracer; (C) node containing the 32 nm tracer.](/cms/asset/2e411743-7984-4b15-9819-6e822c721658/dijn_a_76962_f0005_c.jpg)