Figures & data
Figure 1 X-ray photoelectron spectra of iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia.
Notes: (A) O2− (1s); (B) Zr4+ (3d5/2); (C) Fe3+ (S 2p); (D) for Fe(111) (2p3/2, 2p1/2); and (E) Mn4+ (2p3/2, 2p1/2).
![Figure 1 X-ray photoelectron spectra of iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia.Notes: (A) O2− (1s); (B) Zr4+ (3d5/2); (C) Fe3+ (S 2p); (D) for Fe(111) (2p3/2, 2p1/2); and (E) Mn4+ (2p3/2, 2p1/2).](/cms/asset/2c0895d3-7222-45a9-9b1a-a94de4e54d21/dijn_a_82586_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 Thermogravimetric analysis–differential temperature curves thermograph of the iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia sample.
![Figure 2 Thermogravimetric analysis–differential temperature curves thermograph of the iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia sample.](/cms/asset/a9d5e595-6dd5-4339-aa70-369c1ce68422/dijn_a_82586_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 Fourier transform infrared spectrum of iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia sample.
Notes: (a) Stretching and (b) bending of the OH group; (c) symmetric stretching of the O–S–O bond; and (d) asymmetric stretching frequency of the O=S=O bond.
![Figure 3 Fourier transform infrared spectrum of iron(+3)–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia sample.Notes: (a) Stretching and (b) bending of the OH group; (c) symmetric stretching of the O–S–O bond; and (d) asymmetric stretching frequency of the O=S=O bond.](/cms/asset/14af81f1-28e1-40b7-8f92-7c5406c0087c/dijn_a_82586_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 X-ray diffraction pattern of the Fe3+-Mn4+-SO4/ZrO2 sample calcined at 650°C for 5 hours.
Note: (a) Tetragonal phase of zirconia.
![Figure 4 X-ray diffraction pattern of the Fe3+-Mn4+-SO4/ZrO2 sample calcined at 650°C for 5 hours.Note: (a) Tetragonal phase of zirconia.](/cms/asset/d1d809b2-85ce-4824-a6a0-f71b553cb361/dijn_a_82586_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Transmission electron microscopy image of the Fe3+-Mn4+-SO4/ZrO2 sample calcined at 650°C for 5 hours.
![Figure 5 Transmission electron microscopy image of the Fe3+-Mn4+-SO4/ZrO2 sample calcined at 650°C for 5 hours.](/cms/asset/e33c992c-ce7b-458e-9b71-87341f135b19/dijn_a_82586_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia NP and chemotherapeutic effects on the viability of treated cells, which were evaluated through mitochondrial activity using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay.
Notes: Mean ± standard deviation (n=3 wells/treatment). *P<0.05 compared with the untreated cells.
Abbreviations: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; NP, nanoparticle.
![Figure 6 Iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia NP and chemotherapeutic effects on the viability of treated cells, which were evaluated through mitochondrial activity using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay.Notes: Mean ± standard deviation (n=3 wells/treatment). *P<0.05 compared with the untreated cells.Abbreviations: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; NP, nanoparticle.](/cms/asset/bad08158-5d99-4800-b784-14796755c53c/dijn_a_82586_f0006_c.jpg)
![Figure 6 Iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia NP and chemotherapeutic effects on the viability of treated cells, which were evaluated through mitochondrial activity using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay.Notes: Mean ± standard deviation (n=3 wells/treatment). *P<0.05 compared with the untreated cells.Abbreviations: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; NP, nanoparticle.](/cms/asset/00b0714d-aa3f-4d84-9333-283322c4bfa4/dijn_a_82586_f0006a_b.jpg)
Table 1 Comparison of IC50 values for HepG2 cells, HT29 cells, MDD-MB231 cells, Chang cells, and HUVECs obtained from MTT assay following exposure to iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia nanoparticles and chemotherapies for 72 hours
Figure 7 The morphological changes of HepG2 cells, HT29 cells, MDD-MB231 cells, Chang cells, and HUVECs treated with iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia nanoparticles at their respective IC50 concentrations for 72 hours..
Abbreviations: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; IC50, concentration of drug needed to inhibit cell growth by 50%; NPs, nanoparticles.
![Figure 7 The morphological changes of HepG2 cells, HT29 cells, MDD-MB231 cells, Chang cells, and HUVECs treated with iron–manganese-promoted sulfated zirconia nanoparticles at their respective IC50 concentrations for 72 hours..Abbreviations: HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; IC50, concentration of drug needed to inhibit cell growth by 50%; NPs, nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/2ec3f040-3a7b-471c-aab3-db420d7cc4c9/dijn_a_82586_f0007_c.jpg)