Figures & data
Figure 1 Surface nanostructured at 10 V (A), 20 V (C), and 30 V (E); histograms of 10 V (B), 20 V (D), and 30 V (F) nanotube diameters.
![Figure 1 Surface nanostructured at 10 V (A), 20 V (C), and 30 V (E); histograms of 10 V (B), 20 V (D), and 30 V (F) nanotube diameters.](/cms/asset/5e839942-e918-496a-bd77-3cc1e74df36c/dijn_a_87474_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy images of 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V samples with Saos-2 cells on day 3 after seeding.
Notes: Scale bar 1 μm (A, B), scale bar 500 nm (C). Vega3 scanning electron microscope (Tescan).
![Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy images of 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V samples with Saos-2 cells on day 3 after seeding.Notes: Scale bar 1 μm (A, B), scale bar 500 nm (C). Vega3 scanning electron microscope (Tescan).](/cms/asset/97994886-1faf-444a-b5a5-be9eea8fcf45/dijn_a_87474_f0002_b.jpg)
Table 1 Surface composition (%wt) evaluated by X-ray photo electron spectroscopy
Figure 3 X-ray photoelectron spectra of Ti 2p (A), Al 2p (B), and V 2p3/2 (C) on nanostructured surface.
![Figure 3 X-ray photoelectron spectra of Ti 2p (A), Al 2p (B), and V 2p3/2 (C) on nanostructured surface.](/cms/asset/98fc2e14-aa18-495f-a9d4-ac542ef42654/dijn_a_87474_f0003_b.jpg)
Figure 5 Densities and viability of human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes.
Notes: Control Ti_C and glass coverslips on days 1 (A), 3 (B), 7 (C), and cell growth curves on these surfaces (D). Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean from six measurements. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.
![Figure 5 Densities and viability of human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes.Notes: Control Ti_C and glass coverslips on days 1 (A), 3 (B), 7 (C), and cell growth curves on these surfaces (D). Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean from six measurements. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.](/cms/asset/3273453c-9708-457e-816b-c144818876ee/dijn_a_87474_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Immunofluorescence staining of vinculin (green) and F-actin (red) in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.
Notes: 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258. Leica SPE confocal microscope, objective 63×, zoom 2×, scale 25 μm.
![Figure 6 Immunofluorescence staining of vinculin (green) and F-actin (red) in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.Notes: 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258. Leica SPE confocal microscope, objective 63×, zoom 2×, scale 25 μm.](/cms/asset/f7235f36-1989-4693-91ae-ba4bae7a0692/dijn_a_87474_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure 7 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips on day 3.
Notes: Immunofluorescence intensity (A, B) and absorbance measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C, D) of talin (A, C) and vinculin (B, D). Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.
![Figure 7 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips on day 3.Notes: Immunofluorescence intensity (A, B) and absorbance measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C, D) of talin (A, C) and vinculin (B, D). Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.](/cms/asset/9ec68184-552e-4224-b6fa-65852227ae4c/dijn_a_87474_f0007_b.jpg)
Figure 8 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips on day 7.
Notes: Immunofluorescence intensity of collagen (A), ALP (B), osteopontin (C), and osteocalcin (D). Data expressed as means ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.
![Figure 8 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips on day 7.Notes: Immunofluorescence intensity of collagen (A), ALP (B), osteopontin (C), and osteocalcin (D). Data expressed as means ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.](/cms/asset/9af17e7b-4dce-442b-8b83-c5fb49824888/dijn_a_87474_f0008_b.jpg)
Figure 9 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips.
Notes: Absorbance of collagen type I (A), ALP (B), osteopontin (C), osteocalcin (D), and calcium content (E). Measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (A–D) and by Alizarin staining (E) on day 7. Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.
![Figure 9 Human Saos-2 osteoblasts on 10 V, 20 V, and 30 V nanotubes, on control Ti_C, and on glass coverslips.Notes: Absorbance of collagen type I (A), ALP (B), osteopontin (C), osteocalcin (D), and calcium content (E). Measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (A–D) and by Alizarin staining (E) on day 7. Data expressed as mean ± standard error of mean. P≤0.05 considered significant in comparison with samples labeled above columns.](/cms/asset/9d16db3e-41c3-4425-b32d-3143ce5f85e6/dijn_a_87474_f0009_b.jpg)
Figure S1 The immunofluorescence staining of talin and staining of F-actin with phalloidin in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.
Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 100×, oil immersion. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.
![Figure S1 The immunofluorescence staining of talin and staining of F-actin with phalloidin in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 100×, oil immersion. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.](/cms/asset/22ff46ee-441a-4736-9909-8104707c2cd7/dijn_a_87474_sf0001_c.jpg)
Figure S2 Immunofluorescence staining of collagen in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.
Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.
![Figure S2 Immunofluorescence staining of collagen in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.](/cms/asset/eca94fc6-4dd6-4433-8ba1-a560cacaf7a0/dijn_a_87474_sf0002_c.jpg)
Figure S3 The immunofluorescence staining of ALP in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.
Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.
![Figure S3 The immunofluorescence staining of ALP in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.](/cms/asset/3ce4504b-3952-4a46-85fb-2727cdbed346/dijn_a_87474_sf0003_c.jpg)
Figure S4 Immunofluorescence staining of osteopontin in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.
Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.
![Figure S4 Immunofluorescence staining of osteopontin in human Saos-2 osteoblasts.Notes: On 10 V (A), 20 V (B), and 30 V (C) nanotubes, on control Ti_C (D), and on glass coverslips (E) on day 3. Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope, IX71 digital camera, objective 20×, bar 100 μm. Cell nuclei (blue) were counterstained with Hoechst 33258.](/cms/asset/1c59ea8b-efff-42f0-88b8-2e8d7632f2cb/dijn_a_87474_sf0004_c.jpg)