Figures & data
Figure 1 The cytotoxic effects of Phenol (positive control), CS and CS/SIM/PLGA bone grafts.
Notes: D1 cells were treated with extraction medium obtained from the bone grafts. LDH leakage was analyzed to evaluate cell cytotoxicity. The values are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean, n=4. ***P<0.001 compared with control group.
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
![Figure 1 The cytotoxic effects of Phenol (positive control), CS and CS/SIM/PLGA bone grafts.Notes: D1 cells were treated with extraction medium obtained from the bone grafts. LDH leakage was analyzed to evaluate cell cytotoxicity. The values are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean, n=4. ***P<0.001 compared with control group.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.](/cms/asset/876eb910-2d77-4a72-b9dc-06c94cfda3f6/dijn_a_88134_f0001_b.jpg)
Figure 2 Cell adherent effect of D1 cells seeded on PVC (negative control), CS, and CS/SIM/PLGA bone grafts.
Notes: The values are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean, n=3. ***P<0.001 compared with the PVC group.
Abbreviations: PVC, polyvinyl chloride; CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 2 Cell adherent effect of D1 cells seeded on PVC (negative control), CS, and CS/SIM/PLGA bone grafts.Notes: The values are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean, n=3. ***P<0.001 compared with the PVC group.Abbreviations: PVC, polyvinyl chloride; CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/470c290b-34ac-4650-9e59-4c4b6b444eb0/dijn_a_88134_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 Histological specimens from calvarial defects 8 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 3 Histological specimens from calvarial defects 8 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/fe7504c5-1b08-41d7-8a64-832f173d9b84/dijn_a_88134_f0003_c.jpg)
Figure 4 Histological specimens from calvarial defects 10 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 4 Histological specimens from calvarial defects 10 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/4c98f61b-4821-456d-abe3-45c5cdd94b21/dijn_a_88134_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 Histological specimens from calvarial defects after 12 weeks of implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.
Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 5 Histological specimens from calvarial defects after 12 weeks of implantation of bone graft substitutes with hematoxylin-eosin staining.Note: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/afbdd0f0-daa4-4cf0-84ad-736eee46d682/dijn_a_88134_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 Histological quantification study of new bone matrix formation at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.
Note: **P<0.0001 compared with controls and between treatment groups, respectively.
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 6 Histological quantification study of new bone matrix formation at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.Note: **P<0.0001 compared with controls and between treatment groups, respectively.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/66bbd7d8-b83a-4e8b-8d65-ff846a0aef88/dijn_a_88134_f0006_b.jpg)
Figure 7 Immunohistochemistry analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in calvarial defects 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.
Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. (A–L) Higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas are shown as .
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 7 Immunohistochemistry analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in calvarial defects 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. (A–L) Higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas are shown as Figure 8.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/fefdff07-220c-4d6e-8fc9-3871e1e2757d/dijn_a_88134_f0007_c.jpg)
Figure 8 Immunohistochemistry analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.
Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. A–L show the higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas in . Control group (A–C); CS group (D–F); CS/PLGA group (G–I); CS/SIM/PLGA group (J–L).
![Figure 8 Immunohistochemistry analysis of bone morphogenetic protein-2 expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. A–L show the higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas in Figure 7. Control group (A–C); CS group (D–F); CS/PLGA group (G–I); CS/SIM/PLGA group (J–L).](/cms/asset/dd8384a3-8d0f-4036-ad4d-9c7e4d9cab50/dijn_a_88134_f0008_c.jpg)
Figure 9 Immunochemistry analysis of von Willebrand factor expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.
Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. (A–L) Higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas are shown as .
Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.
![Figure 9 Immunochemistry analysis of von Willebrand factor expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls. (A–L) Higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas are shown as Figure 10.Abbreviations: CS, calcium sulfate; SIM, simvastatin; PLGA, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres.](/cms/asset/e739ec07-1347-4156-9ea8-eda303a1512a/dijn_a_88134_f0009_c.jpg)
Figure 10 Immunohistochemistry analysis of von Willebrand factor expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.
Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls (magnification 400×). A–L show the higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas in . Control group (A–C); CS group (D–F); CS/PLGA group (G–I); CS/SIM/PLGA group (J–L).
![Figure 10 Immunohistochemistry analysis of von Willebrand factor expression in calvarial defects at 8, 10, and 12 weeks after implantation of bone graft substitutes.Notes: Calvarial defects implanted without bone graft substitutes were used as controls (magnification 400×). A–L show the higher magnification of the rectangle inset areas in Figure 9. Control group (A–C); CS group (D–F); CS/PLGA group (G–I); CS/SIM/PLGA group (J–L).](/cms/asset/925e5acd-6109-4f0d-80ac-f37b10efbf7d/dijn_a_88134_f0010_c.jpg)