Figures & data
Figure 1 Photographs of the GO and GO-Ag dispersions (50 µg mL−1) (A). UV-vis absorption spectra of GO and GO-Ag dispersions (B). XRD patterns of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposite (C). Thermogravimetric curves of GO and GO-Ag (D).
Abbreviations: GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; XRD, X-ray diffraction; UV-vis, ultraviolet-visible.
![Figure 1 Photographs of the GO and GO-Ag dispersions (50 µg mL−1) (A). UV-vis absorption spectra of GO and GO-Ag dispersions (B). XRD patterns of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposite (C). Thermogravimetric curves of GO and GO-Ag (D).Abbreviations: GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; XRD, X-ray diffraction; UV-vis, ultraviolet-visible.](/cms/asset/4c5aca97-6034-470c-a039-cefbf6586683/dijn_a_90660_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2 C 1s XPS spectra of GO (A) and GO-Ag (B).
Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite.
![Figure 2 C 1s XPS spectra of GO (A) and GO-Ag (B).Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite.](/cms/asset/9031f24c-6176-4260-8796-4b61376316b2/dijn_a_90660_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3 TEM images of GO (A), and GO-Ag sheets (B, C). Size distribution of AgNPs anchored to GO sheets (D). The size distribution was calculated by counting more than 500 nanoparticles in several GO-Ag images, using ImageJ software.
Abbreviations: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.
![Figure 3 TEM images of GO (A), and GO-Ag sheets (B, C). Size distribution of AgNPs anchored to GO sheets (D). The size distribution was calculated by counting more than 500 nanoparticles in several GO-Ag images, using ImageJ software.Abbreviations: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; AgNPs, silver nanoparticles.](/cms/asset/77fbe5fc-3917-4608-8037-6bc5d440117b/dijn_a_90660_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 1 Values of MICand MBCfor GO and GO-Ag against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria
Table 2 Values of MIC and MBC for oxacillin and AgNPs against MRSA and Escherichia coli as model microorganisms
Figure 4 Time-kill curves of Gram-negative Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (A), and Gram-positive MRSA N315 (B).
Note: Error bars represent the standard deviations of three replicates (n=3).
Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; h, hours; CFU, colony-forming units; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite.
![Figure 4 Time-kill curves of Gram-negative Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 (A), and Gram-positive MRSA N315 (B).Note: Error bars represent the standard deviations of three replicates (n=3).Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; h, hours; CFU, colony-forming units; GO, graphene oxide; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite.](/cms/asset/bdf8e7e1-53ad-4bb7-8c67-c3f0426f66a6/dijn_a_90660_f0004_c.jpg)
Figure 5 TEM images of Escherichia coli cells not exposed to GO-Ag nanocomposite (A, B); and E. coli cells treated with 15 µg·mL−1 GO-Ag for 2 h (C–F). The cell membranes were found to be disrupted after contact with GO-Ag. The disruption of the bacterial cell and subsequent leaking of intracellular contents are highlighted by red arrows in C–F.
Abbreviations: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; h, hours.
![Figure 5 TEM images of Escherichia coli cells not exposed to GO-Ag nanocomposite (A, B); and E. coli cells treated with 15 µg·mL−1 GO-Ag for 2 h (C–F). The cell membranes were found to be disrupted after contact with GO-Ag. The disruption of the bacterial cell and subsequent leaking of intracellular contents are highlighted by red arrows in C–F.Abbreviations: TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; h, hours.](/cms/asset/0233e9d4-e399-465c-8627-29b9def98760/dijn_a_90660_f0005_c.jpg)
Figure 6 TEM images of MRSA cells not exposed to GO-Ag nanocomposite (A, B); and MRSA cells treated with 15 µg·mL−1 GO-Ag for 2 h (C–F). The cell membranes were severely damaged after exposure to GO-Ag. Visible damage on the cell surface is indicated by red arrows (C–F).
Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; h, hours.
![Figure 6 TEM images of MRSA cells not exposed to GO-Ag nanocomposite (A, B); and MRSA cells treated with 15 µg·mL−1 GO-Ag for 2 h (C–F). The cell membranes were severely damaged after exposure to GO-Ag. Visible damage on the cell surface is indicated by red arrows (C–F).Abbreviations: MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; GO-Ag, graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite; h, hours.](/cms/asset/081efd9c-2104-4c2c-ad75-3c710a5e9002/dijn_a_90660_f0006_c.jpg)
Figure S1 Ag 3d XPS spectrum of GO-Ag nanocomposite.
Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide.
![Figure S1 Ag 3d XPS spectrum of GO-Ag nanocomposite.Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide.](/cms/asset/7898ae01-5bf5-44f8-94a7-af7e76f7b794/dijn_a_90660_sf0001_c.jpg)
Figure S2 XPS survey spectra of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposite.
Note: (C 1s-carbon and O 1s-oxygen).
Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide.
![Figure S2 XPS survey spectra of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposite.Note: (C 1s-carbon and O 1s-oxygen).Abbreviations: XPS, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; GO, graphene oxide.](/cms/asset/55ffacf3-e429-411f-bb0a-ae213f87ef13/dijn_a_90660_sf0002_c.jpg)
Figure S3 FTIR spectra of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposites.
Abbreviations: FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; GO, graphene oxide.
![Figure S3 FTIR spectra of GO and GO-Ag nanocomposites.Abbreviations: FTIR, Fourier transform infrared; GO, graphene oxide.](/cms/asset/e61bb9ae-3251-400f-b813-e996fb4112fc/dijn_a_90660_sf0003_c.jpg)