211
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Design and evaluation of an intravesical delivery system for superficial bladder cancer: preparation of gemcitabine HCl-loaded chitosan–thioglycolic acid nanoparticles and comparison of chitosan/poloxamer gels as carriers

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 6493-6507 | Published online: 14 Oct 2015

Figures & data

Table 1 Particle size, polydispersity index, and zeta potential values of blank and Gem-HCl-loaded NPs (repeated n=6)

Figure 1 Particle size distribution of blank and Gem-HCl-loaded NPs (repeated n=6).

Notes: Green line, blank NPs; red line, Gem-HCl-loaded NPs.

Abbreviations: Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; NP, nanoparticle.

Figure 1 Particle size distribution of blank and Gem-HCl-loaded NPs (repeated n=6).Notes: Green line, blank NPs; red line, Gem-HCl-loaded NPs.Abbreviations: Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; NP, nanoparticle.

Figure 2 SEM images of blank NPs and Gem-HCl loaded chitosan–TGA NPs.

Notes: Magnification ×25,000 (A and C); magnification ×50,000 (B and D).

Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy; TGA, thioglycolic acid; NP, nanoparticle; Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride.

Figure 2 SEM images of blank NPs and Gem-HCl loaded chitosan–TGA NPs.Notes: Magnification ×25,000 (A and C); magnification ×50,000 (B and D).Abbreviations: SEM, scanning electron microscopy; TGA, thioglycolic acid; NP, nanoparticle; Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride.

Table 2 Viscosity values of chitosan and Plx gels at 25°C and 37°C (n=6)

Figure 3 Frequency-dependent changes of the viscoelastic properties of chitosan versus Plx gels at 25°C and 37°C (n=6).

Note: G′ is the storage modulus and G″ is the loss modulus.

Abbreviations: NP, nanoparticle; Plx, poloxamer.

Figure 3 Frequency-dependent changes of the viscoelastic properties of chitosan versus Plx gels at 25°C and 37°C (n=6).Note: G′ is the storage modulus and G″ is the loss modulus.Abbreviations: NP, nanoparticle; Plx, poloxamer.

Table 3 Mechanical properties of chitosan and Plx gels at 25°C and 37°C (n=6)

Table 4 Bioadhesion values and detachment forces of chitosan and Plx gels (n=6)

Figure 4 In vitro release (A) and ex vivo permeation (B) profiles of Gem-HCl from NPs and NP-loaded chitosan and Plx gels (n=6).

Notes: ∆, Gem-HCl solution; ○ Chitosan–TGA NPs; ▲, NP-loaded chitosan gel; ■, NP-loaded Plx gel. The error bars at some timepoints cannot be seen because they are smaller than the markers.

Abbreviations: Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; NP, nanoparticle; TGA, thioglycolic acid; Plx, poloxamer; min, minutes.

Figure 4 In vitro release (A) and ex vivo permeation (B) profiles of Gem-HCl from NPs and NP-loaded chitosan and Plx gels (n=6).Notes: ∆, Gem-HCl solution; ○ Chitosan–TGA NPs; ▲, NP-loaded chitosan gel; ■, NP-loaded Plx gel. The error bars at some timepoints cannot be seen because they are smaller than the markers.Abbreviations: Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; NP, nanoparticle; TGA, thioglycolic acid; Plx, poloxamer; min, minutes.

Figure 5 Microscopic images of bovine bladder mucosa.

Notes: Healthy bladder mucosa (A); bladder mucosa treated with chitosan–TGA NPs (B); bladder mucosa treated with NP-loaded chitosan gel (C); bladder mucosa treated with NP-loaded Plx gel (D). ➔, urothelium, and ★, lamina propria. H&E staining; magnification ×40.

Abbreviations: TGA, thioglycolic acid; NP, nanoparticle; Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; Plx, poloxamer; H&E, hematoxylin eosin.

Figure 5 Microscopic images of bovine bladder mucosa.Notes: Healthy bladder mucosa (A); bladder mucosa treated with chitosan–TGA NPs (B); bladder mucosa treated with NP-loaded chitosan gel (C); bladder mucosa treated with NP-loaded Plx gel (D). ➔, urothelium, and ★, lamina propria. H&E staining; magnification ×40.Abbreviations: TGA, thioglycolic acid; NP, nanoparticle; Gem-HCl, gemcitabine hydrochloride; Plx, poloxamer; H&E, hematoxylin eosin.