Factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia

Figures & data

Figure 1 Conceptual framework.

Note: Data from references.^40,41,52,56
Abbreviations: ANC, antenatal care; TV, television.

Figure 2 Description of study articles, 2014.

Figure 3 Association of maternal age with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 4 Educational status of the mother with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 5 Educational status of the husband with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 6 Association of women’s autonomy with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 7 Association of parity with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 8 Association of age at first pregnancy with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 9 Association of place of residence on institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 10 Association of knowledge of danger signs during pregnancy with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 11 Association of antenatal care visit with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 12 Association of frequency of antenatal care visit with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 13 Association of type of pregnancy with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

Figure 14 Association of encountering problem with institutional delivery service utilization in Ethiopia, 2000–2014.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; df, degrees of freedom; M–H, Mantel–Haenszel.

AghaSCartonTWDeterminants of institutional delivery in rural Jhang, PakistanInt J Equity Health2011103121801437

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Kalule-SabitiIAmoatengAYNgakeMThe effect of socio-demographic factors on the utilization of maternal health care services in UgandaPopul Health2015281515525

 Google Scholar

GurmesaTSafe delivery service utilization in Metekel zone, Northwest EthiopiaEthiop J Health Sci2008174217219

 Google Scholar

World Population Reference Bureau Data Sheet Available from: http://www.prb.org/pdf14/2014-world-population-data-sheet_eng.pdfAccessed January 11, 2015

 Google Scholar