Figures & data
Figure 1 Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi women (cases versus controls).
Table 1 Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi women (cases versus controls)
Figure 2 Histogram with distribution curve according to the age of infected Saudi infertile women (positively skewed to the right: ie, more cases at a young age).
Figure 3 Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi infertile women (primary versus secondary).
Table 2 Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi infertile women (primary versus secondary infertility)
Figure 4 Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi infertile women (symptomatic versus asymptomatic).
Figure 5 Results of screening tests (Cat.No. 497/TMB and Cat.No. 498/TMB, Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbHGeschäftseinheit Diagnostik, Wedel, Germany) (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay versus McCoy culture).
Table 3 Interpretation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test results
Table 4 Comparing results of screening tests (Cat.No. 497/TMB and Cat.No. 498/TMB, Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbH Geschäftseinheit Diagnostik, Wedel, Germany) (ELISA versus culture)
Table 5 Prediction analysis of screening tests (Cat.No. 497/TMB and Cat.No. 498/TMB, Medac Gesellschaft für klinische Spezialpräparate mbHGeschäftseinheit Diagnostik, Wedel, Germany) (ELISA versus culture)