Figures & data
Figure 1 Study design.
![Figure 1 Study design.](/cms/asset/d9900903-8259-463d-bab0-731d952e7612/djaa_a_176026_f0001_c.jpg)
Table 1 Outcomes evaluated after the index date in each risk cohort
Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the matched treatment arms
Table 3 Incidence of outcomes of interest in the matched non-SCS and SCS arms
Figure 2 HR (95% CI) for each adverse outcome in the SCS arms (vs non-SCS arms). The open squares represent unadjusted, and the closed squares, adjusted results. The adjusted HRs (95% CIs) are shown on the right. See Table S3 for list of confounders.
![Figure 2 HR (95% CI) for each adverse outcome in the SCS arms (vs non-SCS arms). The open squares represent unadjusted, and the closed squares, adjusted results. The adjusted HRs (95% CIs) are shown on the right. See Table S3 for list of confounders.](/cms/asset/b96fc659-7404-4f20-bcfb-82a2066f8f3d/djaa_a_176026_f0002_b.jpg)
Figure 3 (A–C) Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for each adverse outcome in the SCS arms for categorized, cumulative SCS exposures, compared with the reference category of >0 to <0.5-g cumulative exposure. See Table S3 for list of confounders.
![Figure 3 (A–C) Adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) for each adverse outcome in the SCS arms for categorized, cumulative SCS exposures, compared with the reference category of >0 to <0.5-g cumulative exposure. See Table S3 for list of confounders.](/cms/asset/7d7ae815-bcae-4d8b-9a86-7ecd8af93508/djaa_a_176026_f0003_b.jpg)