113
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Matched cohort study of therapeutic strategies to prevent preschool wheezing/asthma attacks

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 309-321 | Published online: 11 Dec 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1 Study schematic.

Notes: The eligibility criterion of two or more OCS prescriptions (at different points in time) could be for any combination of OCS, with or without concomitant SABA, with accompanying code for a lower respiratory complaint. aPrescribed therapy could change during the outcome year after the index date.
Abbreviations: ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; OCS, oral corticosteroid; SABA, short-acting β-agonist.
Figure 1 Study schematic.

Table 1 Baseline year characteristics of children included in the controller (ICS or LTRA) vs SABA matched cohort comparisons

Figure 2 Forest plot depicting OR (95% CIs) of wheezing/asthma attack for the four matched cohort comparisons.

Notes: The reference cohort (attack odds =1.0) is listed second. EF: EF particle; fine: fine particle.
Abbreviations: EF, extrafine; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; SABA, short-acting β-agonist.
Figure 2 Forest plot depicting OR (95% CIs) of wheezing/asthma attack for the four matched cohort comparisons.

Figure 3 Percentage of children with one or more wheezing/asthma attacks during the baseline year (before the first prescription of ICS, LTRA, or repeat SABA) and during the outcome year in the four matched cohort comparisons: (A) ICS ± SABA vs SABA, (B) LTRA ± SABA vs SABA, (C) LTRA vs ICS, and (D) EF-particle ICS vs fine-particle ICS.

Notes: A wheezing/asthma attack was defined as an asthma-related ED attendance, an asthma-related hospital admission, or an OCS prescription coded for asthma or wheeze. EF: EF particle; fine: fine particle.
Abbreviations: ED, emergency department; EF, extrafine; ICS, inhaled corticosteroid; LTRA, leukotriene receptor antagonist; OCS, oral corticosteroid; SABA, short-acting β-agonist.
Figure 3 Percentage of children with one or more wheezing/asthma attacks during the baseline year (before the first prescription of ICS, LTRA, or repeat SABA) and during the outcome year in the four matched cohort comparisons: (A) ICS ± SABA vs SABA, (B) LTRA ± SABA vs SABA, (C) LTRA vs ICS, and (D) EF-particle ICS vs fine-particle ICS.
Figure 3 Percentage of children with one or more wheezing/asthma attacks during the baseline year (before the first prescription of ICS, LTRA, or repeat SABA) and during the outcome year in the four matched cohort comparisons: (A) ICS ± SABA vs SABA, (B) LTRA ± SABA vs SABA, (C) LTRA vs ICS, and (D) EF-particle ICS vs fine-particle ICS.

Table 2 Outcome measures during 1 follow-up year for the controller (ICS or LTRA) vs SABA matched cohort comparisons

Table 3 Baseline year characteristics of children included in the two controller therapy matched cohort comparisons: LTRA vs ICS and EF-particle ICS vs fine-particle ICS

Table 4 Outcome measures during 1 follow-up year for the controller therapy matched cohort comparisons: LTRA vs ICS and EF-particle ICS vs fine-particle ICS